Here is a topic:

The Hindu Nationalist movement, Sangh Parivar, effectively ousted the INC from parliement and transformed the India society. It did so partially by advocating Milton Friedman type capitalist reforms enabling a new class of Hindu rich and powerful (this occurred as a culmination of decades of American aid to India via assistance of capital investment in infrastructure, education, etc). Did the Sangh Parivar work with American efforts to oust the INC which was otherwise traditionally opposed to free market capitalism and weary of American influence? The INC was 'old money' with ties to Britain while the Sangh Parivar was 'new money' with ties to America.

 The Sangh Parivar advocated a nationalism which galvanized Hindus against Muslims, forming poor villagers into RSS militias which targetted Muslims as enemies.  RSS and Sangh Parivar efforts reached crescendoes in the Babri Mosque (Ayodhra) incident which elevated the BJP to national political power. It also was empowered  by the aftermath of the Gujurat train massacres/riots (recently identified by an independent inquiry as caused by an accident rather than Muslim mob as the BJP led Gujurat govt claimed). 

The connection should be noted that the Hindu nationalism used for the villification of Muslims galvanized voters to vote for (knowingly and unknowingly) the BJP (the political face of the RSS And Sangh Parivar movement) and free market capitalist reforms which have in turn enabled massive economic growth.  The massive economic  growth in India during the 1990s parrelleled massive American infusion of investments, financing, etc.  This is hardly coincidental. American firms and foreign policy towards India had been working towards preparing India for capitalist development since its independence from Britain. So one must ask: were American efforts behind the rise to power of the BJP and Sangh Parivar movement?

The RSS and the BJP have utilized (hereonto unlabelled by American political interests as such) terrorist tactics (ie. violence and threat of violence against civilians) for their strategy against Muslims. This has included riots, arsons of Muslim businesses and homes, murders and rapes to ethnically cleanse mixed neighborhoods. These appear to be part of a strategy to empower Hindu nationalist parties and weaken Muslim economic and political power district by district and province by province.  (Ie. Must it be mentioned that the BJP led govt outlawed conversion to Islam AND the slaughter and consumption of beef?) Sangh Parivar thought identifies certain religious beliefs as "Hindu", such as buddhism, hinduism, sikhism. It recognizes certain beliefs as foreign and thus needing to be repressed: Islam, Christianity, Judaism.   As well, Sangh Parivar thought considers all ethnic Indian people as "Hindus" even if they are Muslim, Christian, atheist, etc. Thus, all people not of the "Hindu" belief should be "returned" to their rightful "Hindu" identity eventually rather than tolerated.  Thus BJP legislation becomes progressively anti monotheist and anti Islam. 
 
The most widely seen effort of Sangh Parivar tactics was the Nov 2001 attack on parliement which the BJP led Indian govt used to justify heightened military tension with Pakistan and connect India with the Bush War on Terror campaign. The Guardian recently ran an article on this titled: India's Shame. Sangh Parivar  operatives appear to be involved in manipulating the attack as a pretext for India's "war" much as Russia used/planned the Moscow apartment bombings of 1999 as a pretext of its "war" and America used the 9/11/01 attacks as pretext for its "war".
 

Please look into this.  And Allah knows best.