Print Page | Close Window

Zionist Israel founded by Mafia Criminals

Printed From: IslamiCity.org
Category: Politics
Forum Name: World Politics
Forum Discription: World Politics
URL: http://www.readverse.org/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=10456
Printed Date: 20 September 2019 at 1:14pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 8.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Zionist Israel founded by Mafia Criminals
Posted By: Bismarck
Subject: Zionist Israel founded by Mafia Criminals
Date Posted: 06 October 2007 at 10:46pm
The Jewish mafia criminal Meyer Lanksy, amongst others, smuggled
guns illegally from New York City to Palestine in preparation for
Zionist Israel's 1948 declaration of independence.

Here is an article: http://nynerd.com/jewish-gangsters-of-the
-1920s-30s/

Here are some excerpts from this article, to which I would like you to pay
close attention:

There are few excuses for the behaviour of Jewish gangsters
in the 1920s and 1930s. The best known Jewish gangsters — Meyer
Lansky, Bugsy Siegel, Longy Zwillman, Moe Dalitz — were involved in the
numbers rackets, illegal drug dealing, prostitution, gambling and loan
sharking. They were not nice men.

During the rise of American Nazism in the 1930s and when Israel was
being founded between 1945 and 1948, however,

...

Few of these men were religiously observant. They rarely attended
services
, although they did support congregations financially. They
did not keep kosher or send their children to day schools
.
However,

...

No one should paint gangsters as heroes. They committed acts of great
evil.
But...


Jews are above the law. They can break the law and commit
acts "of great evil", but that's ok.



Here is another quote from the article. Please pay attention:

Historian Robert Rockaway, writing in the journal of the American
Jewish Historical Society, notes that German-American Bund rallies in the
New York City area posed a dilemma for mainstream Jewish leaders. They
wanted the rallies stopped, but had no legal grounds on which to do so.
New York State Judge Nathan Perlman personally contacted Meyer
Lansky
to ask him to disrupt the Bund rallies, with the proviso
that Lansky’s henchmen stop short of killing any Bundists. Enthusiastic
for the assignment, if disappointed by the restraints, Lansky accepted all
of Perlman’s terms except one: he would take no money for the
work.
Lansky later observed, “I was a Jew and felt for those
Jews in Europe who were suffering. They were my brothers.”


Nathan Perlman, a sworn public servant of America, not only
sought out and contacted a known law-breaking fellon, but
offered to bribe him to boot.

In case it is ambiguous to anyone — may I suggest you cut back on the
alcohol? — Jews are above the Law.



Jewish gangsters also helped establish Israel after the war. One
famous example is a meeting between Bugsy Siegel and Reuven Dafne, a
Haganah emissary, in 1945. Dafne was seeking funds and guns to help
liberate Palestine from British rule. A mutual friend arranged for the two
men to meet.

“You mean to tell me Jews are fighting?” Siegel asked. “You mean fighting
as in killing?” Dafne answered in the affirmative.

Siegel replied, “I’m with you.”

For weeks, Dafne received suitcases filled with $5 and $10 bills —
$50,000 in all — from Siegel.

Some have observed that despite their disreputable behavior they could
be good to their people too.



Replies:
Posted By: Daniel Dworsky
Date Posted: 07 October 2007 at 10:26am
Only $50.000!!!!!!!!! That cheap SOB He could have send millions.



Posted By: Daniel Dworsky
Date Posted: 30 October 2007 at 11:44am
Lansky sought asylum here in Israel in 1972 the same year I made aliyah (im       
migration) with my mother and her second husband. He was refused the
right of return on account of not being human let alone Jewish. They
stopped his ass at Lod Airport and shipped it back to the U.S.

Bismark did you know that Hitler was a Christian? Does that make all
Christendom responsible?

Those Looney tunes that flew air planes into the Twin Towers are they the
pride of Islam?

What part of NO don't you understand?


Posted By: ak_m_f
Date Posted: 22 November 2007 at 10:24pm
Originally posted by Daniel Dworsky


Those Looney tunes that flew air planes into the Twin Towers are they the
pride of Islam?


The plane was huge RC prototype being controlled by CIA,FBI,Mossad in the white van... etc...

-------------


Posted By: Bismarck
Date Posted: 09 December 2007 at 10:13pm
Originally posted by Daniel Dworsky

Lansky sought asylum here in Israel in 1972
the same year I made aliyah (im       
migration) with my mother and her second husband. He was refused the
right of return on account of not being human let alone Jewish. They
stopped his ass at Lod Airport and shipped it back to the U.S.

Bismark did you know that Hitler was a Christian? Does that make all
Christendom responsible?

Those Looney tunes that flew air planes into the Twin Towers are they the
pride of Islam?

What part of NO don't you understand?



You have said that Meyer Lanksy was not even human, much less Jewish.


Do you deny that Israel was founded with the guns and money this
"sub-human" criminal
illegally shipped in to Palestine in the years
leading up to 1948?



According to Daniel Dworsky, then, Israel was founded, in a large part, by
the actions of a "less than human" criminal. Those are harsh words, but I
am not inclined to dispute them, save to do as ordered (Matt 5:44; Rom
12:14) and pray that Allah, as befits His Will and Greatest Mercy, looks
kindly upon Meyer Lanksy's soul.


Posted By: Daniel Dworsky
Date Posted: 11 December 2007 at 2:27pm
Originally posted by Bismarck



According to Daniel Dworsky, then, Israel was founded, in a large part, by
the actions of a "less than human" criminal. Those are harsh words, but I
am not inclined to dispute them, save to do as ordered (Matt 5:44; Rom
12:14) and pray that Allah, as befits His Will and Greatest Mercy, looks
kindly upon Meyer Lanksy's soul.


According to Daniel Dworsky, We need a emoticon that expresses being
bored to tears.




Posted By: Sawtul Khilafah
Date Posted: 11 December 2007 at 3:43pm

Zionists never do anything illegal, if anyone says that they do they are being anti-semtici heheh, as crazy as it may sound thats the mainstream medias "logic".



Posted By: Daniel Dworsky
Date Posted: 21 December 2007 at 2:28pm
No it isn't. No one needs a reason to be an anti-semite. They just are.
It is only in recent history that anyone has had a legitimate beef with the
jewish people and then only regarding Zionism. Zionism is the product of
anti-semitisim. We had no where to go and nowhere to be. My people
were suffering terrible and unfair persecution. Granted, It doesn't excuse
our st**id policy in Palestine that result in loss of life and violations of
basic human rights there but folks, you might own up to the fact that
more than a handful of your ancestors and this Nazi bastard's present
gleeful search for a handful of Jewish criminals is not a rational response
to Judaism.

In the meantime, We've got: Protestant on Catholic; Suni on Shiite on
Hindu...

The only thing your self disenfranchised asses can all agree on is that
they all hate Jews.

At least show some gratitude to the Jewish people for providing this
opportunity to unite the world against a common enemy.

Well, unless of course some nutter claiming to be the heart of Islam
decides to take out a couple of buildings in Manhattan and get the entire
western world to mentally link the call of "Allah Akbar" to murderous
intent.

You're right it's not funny. I'm certainly not laughing.


Posted By: martha
Date Posted: 21 December 2007 at 3:32pm

Daniel, I'm also not laughing. I dont think it funny at all that people keep having a go at the Jews.

I have no problem with the Jews, yet I'm muslim. I dont hate the Jews one bit. I dislike what people do from time to time. And that covers people from all religions, including the once I choose to follow.

It seems to me that grown adults behave like spoilt children, in a 'free for all grab a toy, thats my property' party'. When the toy gets broken the child still complains.



Posted By: Bismarck
Date Posted: 23 December 2007 at 3:01am
Originally posted by Daniel Dworsky

No it isn't. No one needs a reason to be an
anti-semite. They just are.
It is only in recent history that anyone has had a legitimate beef with the
jewish people and then only regarding Zionism. Zionism is the product
of
anti-semitisim.
We had no where to go and nowhere to be. My people
were suffering terrible and unfair persecution.


In short, Jews are poor and innocent in Europe, minding their own
business and being put upon by hate-filled, biggoted Euros.

In justifiable self-defense, they react with Zionism.


QUESTION:

Now, this is an "end of the day" type question. Of course, there's this
reason, that reason, the other... this justification, etc.

Do you understand what I'm saying? Will you please refrain from mincing
words and splitting hairs, and just admit you "know what I mean"?

This is an "end of the day" type question:


At the end of the day...

Western Europe was forcibly converted to Roman Catholicism at sword
point, on pain of death, against their indigenous will...

And soon Jews followed the Catholics into Western Europe...

and became, with the backing of the Roman Church, the bankers and
money lenders of W. Europe...

and thereby the Jews, as a group, became as wealthy and wealthier than
kings and princes...

in a "Catholic Occupied" Europe of peons forced to pay heavy taxes to the
Roman Church.


In other words, amidst dirt, squalor, poverty, and woe for the masses of
Europeans...
Jews, backed by the Catholic power, and living inside lands to which
they had utterly no historical claim
, became (as a group) extremely
wealthy.


Poor, dirty Germans, Poles, and Europeans look across town to see
foreign immigrants living high off the hog, in their (German, Polish,
European) ancestral Fatherlands — and associated with the
tyrannical Catholic power that was taxing them into the gutter.



Factually true, or false?


Posted By: Bismarck
Date Posted: 23 December 2007 at 3:09am
Originally posted by Sawtul Khilafah

Zionists never do anything illegal, if anyone
says that they do they are being anti-semtici heheh, as crazy as it
may sound thats the mainstream medias "logic".



In other words...

legitimate and fact-based criticism of Zionists and Zionism...

is impossible. (!)


According to themselves, Zionists can do no wrong. They never commit
crimes or ever do anything worthy of condemnation or criticism.

THUS, if anyone criticizes Zionism, they are the problem.


PS: As you are welcome to verify, a Criminal Mentality — the
mindset of thugs, thieves, muggers, and other criminals which
rationalizes their criminal behavior — is one that always
denies responsibility and blames others. Criminals never "own up"
and take responsibility for their actions, they never "repent", they
are hardened to their crime and always "blame the other guy".

Criminal Mentality = "it's always the other's fault"


Posted By: Bismarck
Date Posted: 23 December 2007 at 9:20pm
I will do my best to restrain myself.

(1) I am Bismarck. In my life, I have stolen several GI Joe figures (as
a child). The total dollar value of my criminal behavior is roughly
$10
.

(2) Meyer Lanksy plundered from America, through his many
crimes, around $100,000,000.


CONCLUSION: By dollar value, Lanksy is 10 million
times
more of a criminal swine than Bismarck. That's seven
orders of magnitude
.

When Bismarck points this out...

Bismarck is an "anti-Semite"...

which is worse than being a big-time criminal.


SUMMARY: Meyer Lansky can steel 10 million times more than you,
and still be a saint compared to you (in the hearts and minds of
supporters of Zionist Israel).


Posted By: Daniel Dworsky
Date Posted: 26 December 2007 at 11:03am
Lansky was a criminal who happened to have a jewish heritage and in the
shadow of his advancing cancer sought to buy his way into the "next
world"by donating spare change to Zion.

Jews lived in poverty in Europe for hundreds of years there was no
collusion between the church and the rabbinate to handle the money
lending and banking.

We were allowed no other jobs. We payed out "loans" some were returned
with interest but when over extended your bloody lot would decide it was
time to have a "pogrom" an ethnic cleansing that cleared all debts and
records of debts including lenders, agents -their wives and children. We
were set up like this for this purpose like a harvest.

We were denied any other kind of employment. This was not an accident.
This was a trap.

Funny that Jews are associated with the
image of money hungry parasites. Bless You with an F. We were the hosts
- bled dry and then devoured on a regular basis country after country
year after year made to live in ghettos like rats
We invented the word Ghetto- the root ghett means "divorce".

You would do well to restrain yourself
PS I'm reporting you to the Mattel toy company you thieving Kraut Pastry







Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 26 December 2007 at 5:39pm

Originally posted by Bismarck

Factually true, or false?

 
I would call your syllogism, rather, glaringly reductionistic.    

 

But, then again, with the possible exception of the incident of the stolen GI Joes, I have learned not only to distrust your simplistic readings of history, Bismarck, but even more the conclusions that you draw –or would have us draw- from those readings.  This present thread is both thematically and logically similar to others that you have started.  I am, for instance, still waiting for you to provide something in the nature of upper-case “PROOF” that “Jews own Europe,” as you contended, in this by now unremembered and sadly languishing thread, the one that you started and quite inexplicably stopped:
 
http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9012&KW=Europe - http://www.islamicity.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9012& ;KW=Europe

 

 

Serv


Posted By: Servetus
Date Posted: 27 December 2007 at 4:04pm

Bismarck wrote:

Poor, dirty Germans, Poles, and Europeans look across town to see foreign immigrants living high off the hog, in their (German, Polish, European) ancestral Fatherlands — and associated with the tyrannical Catholic power that was taxing them into the gutter.

Factually true, or false?

 

Neither.  It is histrionic and insulting.  Sigmund Freud, as I perhaps imperfectly recall, at one point in his controversial book, Moses and Monotheism, places the word host in quotation marks and reminds his readers that there had been a Jewish Community in Cologne since the time of the (pre-Christian) Roman Empire, well before the Germanic (later half-converted, ill-baptized) barbarians claimed it as their own.

 

At the risk, then, of my perhaps continuing to spoil the ongoing Manichean plot between absolute good and evil thus far established in this thread, and if only as it relates to that tyrannical Catholic power referred to above, it might be worth noting this, from Hannah Arendt.  The bold emphasis is added, for those who might like to cut to the chase:   

 

“… The turning point had been in the seventeenth century when, during the Thirty Years’ War [between Protestants and Catholics], precisely because of their dispersion these small, insignificant [Jewish] moneylenders could guarantee the necessary provisions to the mercenary armies of the war-lords in far-away lands and with the aid of small peddlers buy victuals in entire provinces.  Since these wars remained half-feudal, more or less private affairs of the princes … the Jews’ gain in status was very limited and hardly visible.  But the number of court Jews increased because now every feudal household needed the equivalent of the court Jew …

 

The Jews had been the purveyors in wars and the servants of kings, but they did not and were not expected to engage in the conflicts themselves.  When these conflicts enlarged into national wars, they still remained an international element whose importance and usefulness lay precisely in their not being bound to any national cause.  No longer state bankers and purveyors in wars (the last war financed by Jews was the Prussian-Austrian war of 1866, when Bleichroeder helped Bismarck after the latter had been refused the necessary credits by the Prussian Parliament), the Jews had become the financial advisers and assistants in peace treaties and, in a less organized and more indefinite way, the providers of news.   The last peace treaties drawn up without Jewish assistance were those of the Congress of Vienna, between the continental powers and France.  Bleichroeder’s role in the peace negotiations between Germany and France in 1871 was already more significant than his help in war, and he rendered even more important services in the late seventies when, through his connections with the Rothschilds, he provided Bismarck with an indirect news channel to Benjamin Disraeli ...

 

Through the attitude of the [Prussian] Reformers and especially through the emancipation edict of 1812 [which gave Jews political rights], the special interests of the state in the Jews became manifest in a curious way.  The old frank recognition of their usefulness as Jews (Frederick II of Prussia exclaimed, when he heard of possible mass conversion: “I hope they won’t do such a devilish thing!”) was gone.

 

(To support this statement by Frederick II, Arendt provides a footnote, #27, which refers to Kleines Jahrbuch des Nutzlichen und Angenehmen fur Israeliten, 1847.)

 

Ref:  Arendt, Hannah, The Origins of Totalitarianism, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York, 1951, pp. 16-30 

 

 

 

Serv




Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums version 8.04 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2006 Web Wiz Guide - http://www.webwizguide.info