Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin  Old ForumOld Forum  Twitter  Facebook
Advertisement:
         

World Politics
 IslamiCity Forum - Islamic Discussion Forum : Politics : World Politics
Message Icon Topic: An open letter to ’the world"(Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 7 Next >>
Author Message
herjihad
 
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 26 January 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2473
bullet Posted: 12 August 2007 at 3:50am

Salaamu Alaykum,

Israeli Avatar's posts are filled with disgust towards all Muslims.  If his claims are true of loving certain kinds of Muslims, then he should love Brother Andalus and I because we both abhore oppression of any kind.  He posts examples, which I fortunately didn't see, but can imagine from the responses to it, which are awful, the worst behavior of any Muslim citizen turned criminal and ignores all the beautiful things Islaam has done and will continue to do.

For example, two of the people I admire most are in reality occupiers of the Phalasteeneeyee land, and yet, I wouldn't have them leave.  They are Uri Averny and Daniel Dworsky.  Uri would be a great leader of Israel and would be able to bring peace to both sides if the side of evil in Israel were not completely supported with America's weaponry and money.  If anyone points out anyone's lack of belief, we need to remember that Allah, The Guide, might choose to change that at any time and this is a political discussion.

But I sure would like for my father-in-law to be able to go home for more than just a visit.  And even the visits are too much for an older gentleman without much money.  It is so tiring to go through Israeli border checks and takes hours and hours and you can't plan for the time or know if they will detain you or any member of your group.

Need I remind members not to swear so much?  Well, here it is anyway.  Stop swearing guys.  When we use bigger words like "obfuscate" -- I just love that word Brother Andalus as it applies and will continue to apply to IAvatar and the likes of him -- instead of smaller words like wt... and fr...

That silver spoon stuff is nonsense.

Muslims are required to be empathetic.  We cannot look at someone else's suffering with arrogrance or superiority.  We must approach it as all things in life with humility and piety.  (I know this not only because it is intuitive that it be so, but also because I have heard some learned sheikhs lecture on loving our fellow Muslims and fellow human beings in such a manner.)  Ameen.

Salaams

 

 

 

 



Edited by herjihad
Al-Hamdulillah (From a Married Muslimah) La Howla Wa La Quwata Illa BiLLah - There is no Effort or Power except with Allah's Will.
IP IP Logged
Israeli_Avatar
 
Guest Group
Guest Group


Joined: 08 August 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 34
bullet Posted: 12 August 2007 at 7:54am
I am just paranoid and concentrating on the negative? The negative is always the most prominent, but I think you fail to see that I am doing what many of your brothers do to my civilization. My problem is never the criticism because you guys are correct many of times when you are not espousing paranoid political nonsense about Jewish conspiracies and "Zionist propoganda." Maybe I am just pessimistic, maybe there is plenty of goodness that I do not see, but there is still a myriad of terror and horror that sticks out like a sore thumb. Do I generalize? Sure, but at a certain point, one is forced to generalize. At the same time, I do no more and no less than any one of you when you talk about the Jewish people. I read such hatefull and biased things, when there are millions of Jews (and that is a lot when considering the size of the population) that have radically different views from myself, and are unrealitically optomistic, and support many of you while you call them "filthy pigs" and "dogs." It is just a nightmare. Once again, it is not all your criticism against myself or the state of Israel that is invalid, it is the lack the lack of criticism against your reflections, and the hypocristy that is flawed.

Edited by Israeli_Avatar
IP IP Logged
Israeli_Avatar
 
Guest Group
Guest Group


Joined: 08 August 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 34
bullet Posted: 12 August 2007 at 8:18am

Israeli Avatar's posts are filled with disgust towards all Muslims.  If his claims are true of loving certain kinds of Muslims, then he should love Brother Andalus and I because we both abhore oppression of any kind.  He posts examples, which I fortunately didn't see, but can imagine from the responses to it, which are awful, the worst behavior of any Muslim citizen turned criminal and ignores all the beautiful things Islaam has done and will continue to do.

Enlighten me and give me examples of this beauty. Are you speaking of the inner peace that Islam provides? Can this not be overshadowed by the nefariousness that one clearly sees when looking at the middle east?

For example, two of the people I admire most are in reality occupiers of the Phalasteeneeyee land, and yet, I wouldn't have them leave.  They are Uri Averny and Daniel Dworsky.  Uri would be a great leader of Israel and would be able to bring peace to both sides if the side of evil in Israel were not completely supported with America's weaponry and money.  If anyone points out anyone's lack of belief, we need to remember that Allah, The Guide, might choose to change that at any time and this is a political discussion.

You are saying I "obfuscate"? You must have woken up on the wrong side of the bed this morning. What you are speaking of will lead to a peace, a peace where Israelies will rest in peace. If Israel will not be supported by American money, it will cease to exist. Like many countries throughout the world, Israel depends on external support. This is not a novel occurrence, nor is this something that shocks me, this is just a reality that has always been, and will always be. What you are speaking about will destroy an entire group of people, this cannot and will not happen. Israel is America's greatest ally, and will always be so.

But I sure would like for my father-in-law to be able to go home for more than just a visit.  And even the visits are too much for an older gentleman without much money.  It is so tiring to go through Israeli border checks and takes hours and hours and you can't plan for the time or know if they will detain you or any member of your group.

You know, when I see Palestinians violating the check points, I always call it in, and make sure that they are arrested. I would rather have you tired and pissed off than my children dead. Thank you very much.

Need I remind members not to swear so much?  Well, here it is anyway.  Stop swearing guys.  When we use bigger words like "obfuscate" -- I just love that word Brother Andalus as it applies and will continue to apply to IAvatar and the likes of him -- instead of smaller words like wt... and fr...

Of course you love such terms when they are spoken of the opposition, it is just human nature.

That silver spoon stuff is nonsense.

Muslims are required to be empathetic.  We cannot look at someone else's suffering with arrogrance or superiority.  We must approach it as all things in life with humility and piety.  (I know this not only because it is intuitive that it be so, but also because I have heard some learned sheikhs lecture on loving our fellow Muslims and fellow human beings in such a manner.)  Ameen.

That I agree with, God bless!

Salaams



Edited by Israeli_Avatar
IP IP Logged
Israeli_Avatar
 
Guest Group
Guest Group


Joined: 08 August 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 34
bullet Posted: 12 August 2007 at 2:10pm
My argument is not legitimate because it is coming from a personal point of view? First of all, what perspective is non-personal? Second, there is no one charecteristic that defines a perspective, there are many. This is completely foolish, to suggest that this is just coming from a personal perspective; such ideas are devoid of reason, and true meaning.

Edited by Israeli_Avatar
IP IP Logged
Andalus
 
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1187
bullet Posted: 13 August 2007 at 12:41am

Most of your reply here is juvenile “quibbling”, tit for tat responses that only further expose your ignorance and lack of maturity. It is not worth spending any more time on, as what can a person do when, even after pointing to the moon, the fool refuses to look in the referred direction. A fool cannot be made to look at the moon, he can only be given the direction, and it is up to him to look. If the fool still babbles about the ground, then nothing can be done.  

Here is an example:  [andalus]

ad hominem. Are you showing your true colors? hmmm

[/quote]

To which you made such a brilliant reply:

Originally posted by Israeli

Just like your brothers and sisters.

You have lost your credibility.

 

The tautological drivel you have attempted to use to maintain your sophomoric reply to sister "herjihad" and to try and save face to my pointing out of your numerous fallacies and mistakes says volumes about you.

You have fooled no one.

 

Originally posted by Israeli_Avatar

Originally posted by Andalus

Originally posted by Israeli_Avatar

There is much to address, so I will start with most ascerbic

 

commentaries on what I have stated. It seems that many of you do not actually read, but just speak. That is perfectly ok, I understand who I am dealing with.

ad hominem. Are you show your true colors? hmmm

Just like your brothers and sisters.

 

"Semantics. Arab Christians and Muslims and "actual" Middle Eastern Jews were well established in the region under the Ottomans and workled the land and lived on the land, etc, etc, etc."

What exactly do you mean by well established? You see westerners and non-westerners have different ideas of such a reality. For me, living in a sand pit under the oppresive Ottomon Empire would not be considered well established.

Trying to befuddle a point through mere semantics speaks volumes of the chicanery you are trying to smear the thread with.

I am trying to understand what the hell your trying to say actually.

 

As for the red herring you threw out about the Ottomans: suppositional zionist drivel. The typical American lacky will take your Zionist misinformation as fact, but this is hardly an audience made up of the typical American.

Yes, the typical Muslim that lives in America, if you want to enlighten me, then please show please show me a scholarly source that says other wise.

"You are trying to obfuscate the point through pointless semantics."

You are using the word "obfuscate" too much, why don't you open up a dictionary and learn another word? It is of course pointless semantics if it does not glorify your so-called moral and logical perspectives.

Why would I change the label of theif for someone who steals and continues to steal? No rational person would change the word to fit the thief. Likewise, why would I find another term to describe your diatribe? If you dislike the term, then loose the poor sophistry.

That is not a label, but an action. I am merely suggesting for you to expand your vocabulary. Do not take everything so politically. And you are not the theif? The Ottomons were not theives? Let me guess, the Muslims are exempt from being labeled theives because the world belongs to them.

 

"Strawman. No one has argued contrary to this nor does this point invalidate what has been stated."

Yes, that is true, but no Muslim would ever address such facts, it wouldn't be politically viable to do so. You claim superimposition in the land of Israel becuase you are the majority.

If you agree that it was a strawman, then we can both agree that the red herring has no validity and therefore requires no further attention. This in no way means I agree or disagree, it means the point is not valid.

You agree that the point is a truth? So how is it the the truth is invalid? That doesn't even make sense.

 

"That was a great manipulation of the thread. Only a zionist could try and pull off such charades. This is Zionist propoganda and you know it. None of which holds any water and this is simply meant to "obfuscate". Keep in mind that the forum is not made up of the weak and usual ignorant mind set of the typical American. The heavy Zionist lobby was able to hood wink most Americans because they are too wrapped up in their materialism to leanr anything about history and the world. In other words, this intellectually bankrupt diatribe works on FOX news, or with the followers of John Hagee, but not at this forum."

When you assert words like manipulation or obfuscation, please, in spite of your higher knowledge, give me an alternative explantion, and pespective on this issue.

 

I do not assert words, although I can assert meanings, but the meanings are not simply asserted given I have used them in general terms. If you have a particular question about a particular instance that you have some confusion over, then please form a valid question and I will do my best to explain or make a correction if I am wrong. As far as I can see, you are attempting to "befuddle" the point I made with an unreasonable request.

I have only seen things that are absolutely devoid of meaning. You understood exactly what I was saying. If you believe that my perspective on history is propoganda, then prove it. Do not just label what I say as a manipulation, but put your money where your mouth is and go a step further.

Ignorant mind set of the typical American, and what is exactly does it mean to be a typical American, aren't you living in America?

 

Complex question: being a typical American does not imply that every American is typical. So me being in America, and me being an American, in no way implies that I am "typical".

Good point

My statements that reflect my usage of the word, "typical",  when describing the Zionist drivel you are trying to push off on the forum, is in relation to the "typical" America who elects the leaders who set foriegn policy that reflect a clear "Zionist"/"Israeli" blind support based upon the typical "Zioinst drivel" that is similar to the "drivel" you have tried to use here.

Who are these leaders and what are the alternatives?

The general word usage expressed in my statements with regard to your suppositional nonsense provide the context from which one, with even a cursory education, shoule be able to deduce the meaning/s.

So I guess your education must be very superficial.

I cannot make it any more "clear", and if your sophistry presses in this direction, I can only suspect ignorance on your part or chicanery.

Your contributions so far have revealed sufficient ability, so I must conclude "chicanery". Am I wrong?

How can a somewhat educated man like you be wrong?

 What is this Zionist lobby? And are you saying that Zionist's are not really Americans? Since when were those things mutually exclusive? And I guess intelectually indigent diatribes would never work on Al gezera or whatever your news stations are.  

1) Zionist Lobby? Either you are joking, obtuse, or obfuscating: Groups that are pro Zionist that lobby US politics.

Such as, be specfic?

2) I did not make any reference to the relationship between Zionism and being an American which includes a universal qualifier (no Americans are Zionists..etc, etc) That would leave your question regarding exclusivity in such a relationship as "complex".

Please define what it means it to be an American when you say such things. You have to be a little bit more clear.

3) Your last comment was an incoherent attempt at a red herring. I think I would put up a "at work" sign on that one.

Perhaps you should use your cursory education to take another gander.

"Nice rhetorical dance. I will answer for you: They were white Europeans, some with Turkic ancestory."

"That was not so hard!?"

Please clarify the aforementioned, I cannot comment on this contorted answer.

rubbish. The question given to you was quite clear to you simply practiced your pattern of masterful evasion. I answered for you. Refer back to the actual question (funny...I cannot help but think of your ad hominem concerning reading before talking..seriously, the question was rather straightforward)

I have no clue as to what the hell your blabbing about. Clarify your position, you are veering off into nothingness.

"Excuse me, were you involved with the Ottomans? You seem to have first hand knowledge. This is simply more manipulation. Your movement excells at information manipluation."

I never claimed to have first hand knowledge of anything, but I was involved in history through a plethora of mediums. My movement through what?

Neither did the sister who brought up historical atrocities commited by the thuggish Israeli regime. But that made no difference when you made an unreasonable demand on her as a requirement to discuss Israeli atrocities. You are now committing the fallacy of special pleading. You can quote your suppositional rubbish about history that fits your twisted, Zioinst world view, without any involvement in the stated events, but this cannot be allowed when it is about the spiritually, and morally bankrupt state of Israel and its dubious creation.

This "sister" used very vivid imagery, I was stating a very reasonable question, and asking her where she recived such "tranparent" imagery. It is very interesting, but I have never heard or seen such things in the west bank. Why are you speaking about spiritually? I thought we were on politics.

Movement: Zionism

Ok

"duh!.....they have only been the established people that Zionists have kicked the crap out of for 40 years now. What planet are you from?"

Here you just got cocky and missed the point completely, that was my response for one of your Arab brothers, you have to read carefully. And in reality, the "Zionists" have been involved in this conflict a little longer, and as far as them kicking the crap out of the Palestinians, I never argued against this point, but stated that there are no innocent parties.

But I can "understand" Palestinian anger, while Israeli agression is unfounded. If someone from another land, gave my land away to another people in another land, I would be "pissed off" to no end, and I doubt I would sit calm and peaceful in some crap hole camp set up by the Israeli regime.

So why are you living in the United States or anywhere else for that matter? These things have occured many times over in history, all over the world.

"Euro Jews worked with Euro Christians to take land away from one people and give it to another."

There were many land contracts issued by the Europeans that were contradictory. The point in this situation is that anachronisms and generalizations are used by your side all the time.

No, the manipulation of history is an art that has been brought to its apex by Zioinst and pro zionist thinkers. It is very simple: Someone gave another groups land away, to yet another people, and then these people have the nerve to cry "foul", and then build another holocaust museum to remind everyone that Israelis are really the victims (no I am not a holocaust denier).

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't the Ottomons conquer that territory? And didn't the Romans take that land away from the Jews? And didn't over half a million Jews live in this land as Palestinians among these Muslims who persecuted them for centuries and forcefully converted them, while raping their women? And what happened to the land and property taken by Muslims from Jews in Islamic countries before the creation of the state of Israel? Why don't you complain about that?

The Jewish people likewise utilize such tactics, and assert a claim to the land, but the contemporary political situation is more complicated than that, and you are just over-symplifying things. 

The Israeli nation was founded on people who had nothing to do with the land! What color is your sky?!

So was America. What are you doing there, and why do you call yourself a non-typical American? If you feel so strongly against such actions then you shouldn't be in this country.

"Complex question (a fallacy)."

The reason for this question being a fallacy is because it is complex? Is this what they teach you in Saudi Arabia? Is this the reason why you are all so educated?

A complex question is a question that has buried in its premise an unargued, unproven assertion. Thats why it is complex. 

What assertion would that be, and why is it unproved? Please show me a scholarly source, I am all ears, I would love to see your "rational" side of things.

 

"The criminal zion state is at the epitome of a criminal and racist ideology. What does Israel know of "humanity". The state was born out of lie and deceit, and one day, Praise be to God, it will also die in lies and deceit."

The epitome of racist and criminal ideology by what standard and criterion exactly? It may have been born out of such things, but so was every other country, nation, empire, and religion. I have no problem with what you are saying, other than the fact that you are hypocrite. And if it does die, it will take you with it.

poor analogy. In this world, nothing has at its bases a single attribute, but a mix. Nothing is purely evil, even Hitler treated his lover with kindess. In this world, when we seek the attributes of "such and such" thing, we must speak in terms of its "predominant" attributes. You cannot simply say, "ok....Israel may have some racism, but so did everyone else". That kind of broad, sweeping generalization is problematic, not to mention commits equivocation fallacies with the word racism and the ideas of race and minority treatment. You cannot just "handwave" your way though that.

Ms. Braun was treated with indifference, their wasn't much kindess there because the man was very callous. This is not a broad sweeping generalization, but a verity. Israel is no more racist than any Muslim regime, or even America. Israel is actually a very liberal society that wants nothing to do with the Palestinians or the territories of 67.

 

"who cares, you can play semantics all day long with that word until it fits your agenda, and one day that agenda will change as will your definition. The truth is in action, and your movement is "criminal""

I guess you are a prohet and a logician, that does not manipulate information in order to make it fit his agenda. The truth is a matter of perception, but it may also be an action. And my movement may be criminal, but so is yours, criminality pervades everything to a degree.

I have made no claim to prophethood. I will say that movements such as Zionism count on the fact that truth can be manipulated by perception, which is why so many Americans are willing to sacrifice the blood of their children for Israeli foreign policy and have no idea they are doing so. 

Sure you have, implictly. The truth will always be manipulated, either by your or someone else. I have no issue with what you are saying, I only have a problem with the hypocrisy.

 

"There is true that Zionism and Jew are not necessarily the same things. I know of Jews who rightfully despise Zionsim."

We all like people that agree with us, it is human nature.

"LOL.....Zioinst propoganda. Simply "rubbish". The zionist want the world to know that the Palestinians are better off having Zioinst thugs controlling them. That is so idiotic that I will not give it any more attention."

You said that you will not give this any more attention, and yet you state something right after. Of course the Palestinians are better off living under the Saudis, or Iraqis, or whatever, so that there land can be a paradise just like Afganistan, minus the virgins of course.

I did not comment on the nonsense about the Ottomans. That is what I refered to.

Please show me the scholarly evidence for your reasoning.

Nor have I argued about Palestinian/Saudi relations..come now, this is simply more irrelevant riffraff. And your "virgin" comment is yet another red herring. I think I can let that go, after all, we shall not get into the Jewish Abraham "cuckhold" adventures as portrayed in the TANAKH, or even the glorified tales of the lying, deceptive wife of Issac portrayed as a "bitch" who had to use theft and "covert" deception to steal poor Essau's blessings and inheritance to ensure "Israeli" dominance. Sounds familiar yes? It writes out like the playbook that was used to found Israel. Lets not twist my faith to fit your Zionist preconceptions when you have mud all over your face.

The Koran views the Torah as holy document, so I do not understand why you would call her a bitch.  It actually sounds like the playbook used to found anything and everything in human society. Ask the Native Americans, they will tell you.

"Irrelevant, no one is talking about the Taliban."

Thats the problem.

No, the fallacy of irrelevancy is the problem.

The problem is that any fact that undermines your position is ignored by you; being one-sided is human nature, so it is not shocking.

 

"Furthermore, Israel has a lot in common with Iran, and the Taliban: They are all products of western manipulation. The Taliban-> formed as a result of the mess the US left in the country. Iran-> The British and US used false flag operations known as operation Ajax to change a government from a democratically elected one to a corrputed monarchy. The result was the "revolution". Israel-> The British, backed by the US, gave away someone elses land to another people and then armed them and trained them."

And what is not a product of western manipulation in modern society to some degree?

wtf? Did anyone say anything about what influences from western or any other culture is/ or is not in modern society? Did anyone state that there are no degress of influence from any society in another culture? You just evaded again.

I did not evade anything, I merely made the point that you hold Israel to a higher standard than anything else that has ever existed because you have a serious and malicious agenda, which is a fact.

 

 You live in America, you Muslim dildo.

Nice.

 

The Taliban formed as a result of the mess that the Russians left in their country, a little reading may help before speaking.

The Russians were defeated. The Russians were defeated because the US armed the rebels to the teeth with weapons, and the US trained them. The Russians pulled out. Perhaps you should put your Zionist revisionist books down and learn to think critically.

I never disagreed with this, I just stated that the damage caused was done by the USSR.

 As far as Iran is concerned, the US did not act ethically, you are correct on that point. Not only the British, there were many parties involved, and certain Arab tribes were not innocent victims of anything, but potentially murderous groups themselves.

The US and British took out a democratically elected leader with the use of terrorism. You are trying to say that because they found some elements in the society to help them, that somehow it makes the larger populace that the elements belong to "guilty by ethnic affiliation", therefore it was there own fault? Your argument is incoherent. And the irrational association of smaller elements (criminal) does not change my point.

If it was incoherent, then why did you even bother answering. I never said it makes the larger populace guilty by ethnic affilition, I just stated that certain tribes were a liability, and there were no innocent parties on any side.

"Your country stands as a testament to deception and fruad."

Would that be the USA or Israel? Because I am a citezen of both, and you are a resident of one of those countries.

Of course you are. In theory (not saying you do this!), you can come to the US and act like a parasite: vote, influence policy, and suck the US dry all to support a foriegn nation which has no real loyalty to the US.  

I pay the same taxes as you, and my loyalty to the US is far stronger than any Muslims. You are latent traitors, you would have no problem supporting Bin Laden or any other Muslim tyrant.

 

I will answer as much as I can, let's take this a step at a time. Thank you and God bless!

No hard feelings.

May God guide you. 

Not your God! God Bless!

 

A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
IP IP Logged
Israeli_Avatar
 
Guest Group
Guest Group


Joined: 08 August 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 34
bullet Posted: 13 August 2007 at 2:46pm

Most of your reply here is juvenile “quibbling”, tit for tat responses that only further expose your ignorance and lack of maturity. It is not worth spending any more time on, as what can a person do when, even after pointing to the moon, the fool refuses to look in the referred direction. A fool cannot be made to look at the moon, he can only be given the direction, and it is up to him to look. If the fool still babbles about the ground, then nothing can be done.  

Now your just getting blatant, and once again you are dancing around the facts. Stop making excuses for your cowardly and lazy nature. If you do not wish to continue this debate then just say so. 

A fool like you can definately be made to worship the moon!

Here is an example:  [andalus]

ad hominem. Are you showing your true colors? hmmm

[/quote]

To which you made such a brilliant reply:

Israeli wrote:

Just like your brothers and sisters.

 b

You have lost your credibility.

Since when did a Zionist like me ever have it in your eyes to begin with? Look who is obfuscating now! 

The tautological drivel you have attempted to use to maintain your sophomoric reply to sister "herjihad" and to try and save face to my pointing out of your numerous fallacies and mistakes says volumes about you.

I debunked all of your ridiculous responses in totality, you have done nothing. You have presented no scholarly sources, and all you did was espouse a whole bunch of paranoya, and delusion.

You have fooled no one.

And you have managed to fool many with your proganda, my intention was never to fool anyone. You couldn't even address any one of my reponses to your imaginary corrections of my logic, and argument. Instead you take the easy way out and speak of this credibility that I lost with all of this fervent mendacity when I didn't have it to begin with in your peanut sized brain because of your inability to think like a rational human being! All you do is yell trickery, deceit, and "Zionist propoganda" without supporting any of your statements with logic and scholarly sources. Before you debate with me, get an education!



Edited by Israeli_Avatar
IP IP Logged
Andalus
 
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 12 October 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1187
bullet Posted: 13 August 2007 at 11:53pm
Originally posted by Israeli_Avatar

Most of your reply here is juvenile “quibbling”, tit for tat responses that only further expose your ignorance and lack of maturity. It is not worth spending any more time on, as what can a person do when, even after pointing to the moon, the fool refuses to look in the referred direction. A fool cannot be made to look at the moon, he can only be given the direction, and it is up to him to look. If the fool still babbles about the ground, then nothing can be done.  

Now your just getting blatant, and once again you are dancing around the facts. Stop making excuses for your cowardly and lazy nature. If you do not wish to continue this debate then just say so. 

There is no debate, you have not been able to keep up with basics. You have been "quibelling". There are no facts you have presented, you are so desperate and ignorant of basic rhetoric, you have the nerve to demand that your "strawman" be a valid point. WHo is being cowardly?

 

 

A fool like you can definately be made to worship the moon!

Wow! Did you think of that all on your own? LOL....pathetic I guess this is more of your "facts".

 

Here is an example:  [andalus]

ad hominem. Are you showing your true colors? hmmm

To which you made such a brilliant reply:

Israeli wrote:

Just like your brothers and sisters.

 b

You have lost your credibility.

Since when did a Zionist like me ever have it in your eyes to begin with? Look who is obfuscating now!

[/quote]

 

Irrelevant. (talk about a cowardly dance, you really danced around my example of your juvenile nature!) 

 

 

The tautological drivel you have attempted to use to maintain your sophomoric reply to sister "herjihad" and to try and save face to my pointing out of your numerous fallacies and mistakes says volumes about you.

I debunked all of your ridiculous responses in totality, you have done nothing. You have presented no scholarly sources, and all you did was espouse a whole bunch of paranoya, and delusion.

All you can do is howl and write in large fonts and make claims. The truth is, you did not ever reply to any of my points of your huge blunders in your contribution. (by the way, you did not offer any "scholarly" sources, just tit for tat drivel that amounted to you "disagreeing"). As I have said before, how pathetic and ignorant you are to agree that you committed a fallacy, and the demand that it be valid. LOL......PATHETIC.

 

You have fooled no one.

And you have managed to fool many with your proganda, my intention was never to fool anyone. You couldn't even address any one of my reponses to your imaginary corrections of my logic, and argument. Instead you take the easy way out and speak of this credibility that I lost with all of this fervent mendacity when I didn't have it to begin with in your peanut sized brain because of your inability to think like a rational human being! All you do is yell trickery, deceit, and "Zionist propoganda" without supporting any of your statements with logic and scholarly sources. Before you debate with me, get an education!

My statements were about the poor logic in your unsupported claims. You just kept on and on and on with drivel ad nausium! The point was about "logic"..Duh!

You are so out of gas.  

I mean, lets look at your proud example of a poorly written zioinst "pitty party" piece...lets look at your "scholarly" sources..

 

1. Vamberto Morais, A Short History of Anti-Semitism, (NY: W.W Norton and Co., 1976), p. 11; Bernard Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, (NY: WW Norton & Co., 1986), p. 81.

2. Bernard Lewis, "The Pro-Islamic Jews," Judaism, (Fall 1968), p. 401.

3. Bat Ye'or, The Dhimmi, (NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1985), pp. 43-44.

4. Bat Yeor, pp. 30, 56-57; Louis Gardet, La Cite Musulmane: Vie sociale et politique, (Paris: Etudes musulmanes, 1954), p. 348.

5. Bat Yeor, pp. 185-86, 191, 194.

6. Norman Stillman, The Jews of Arab Lands, (PA: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1979), pp. 59, 284.

7. Maurice Roumani, The Case of the Jews from Arab Countries: A Neglected Issue, (Tel Aviv: World Organization of Jews from Arab Countries, 1977), pp. 26-27.

8. Bat Ye'or, p. 61

9. G.E. Von Grunebaum, "Eastern Jewry Under Islam," Viator, (1971), p. 369.

10. Bernard Lewis, The Jews of Islam, (NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984) p. 158.

11. Middle Eastern Studies, (1971), p. 232.

12. New York Times, (February 19, 1947).

13. Roumani, pp. 30-31.

 

This list looks like the whos-who at a Jewish wedding.

Are you that arrogant and ignorant that you really believe that this is a real historical piece worthy of any scholarly trust? Are you that out of your mind? Seriously. Pathetic.

 



Edited by Andalus
A feeling of discouragement when you slip up is a sure sign that you put your faith in deeds. -Ibn 'Ata'llah
http://www.sunnipath.com
http://www.sunniforum.com/forum/
http://www.pt-go.com/
IP IP Logged
Israfil
 
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 08 September 2003
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3984
bullet Posted: 15 August 2007 at 3:25pm

1. Vamberto Morais, A Short History of Anti-Semitism, (NY: W.W Norton and Co., 1976), p. 11; Bernard Lewis, Semites & Anti-Semites, (NY: WW Norton & Co., 1986), p. 81.

2. Bernard Lewis, "The Pro-Islamic Jews," Judaism, (Fall 1968), p. 401.

3. Bat Ye'or, The Dhimmi, (NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1985), pp. 43-44.

4. Bat Yeor, pp. 30, 56-57; Louis Gardet, La Cite Musulmane: Vie sociale et politique, (Paris: Etudes musulmanes, 1954), p. 348.

5. Bat Yeor, pp. 185-86, 191, 194.

6. Norman Stillman, The Jews of Arab Lands, (PA: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1979), pp. 59, 284.

7. Maurice Roumani, The Case of the Jews from Arab Countries: A Neglected Issue, (Tel Aviv: World Organization of Jews from Arab Countries, 1977), pp. 26-27.

8. Bat Ye'or, p. 61

9. G.E. Von Grunebaum, "Eastern Jewry Under Islam," Viator, (1971), p. 369.

10. Bernard Lewis, The Jews of Islam, (NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984) p. 158.

11. Middle Eastern Studies, (1971), p. 232.

12. New York Times, (February 19, 1947).

13. Roumani, pp. 30-31.

 

This list looks like the whos-who at a Jewish wedding.

That was really funny.........

IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 7 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. This forum is offered to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization.
If there is any issue with any of the postings please email to icforum at islamicity.com or if you are a forum's member you can use the report button.

Note: The 99 names of Allah avatars are courtesy of www.arthafez.com

Advertisement:



Sponsored by:
Islamicity Membership Program:
IslamiCity Donation Program  http://www.islamicity.com/Donate
IslamiCity Arabic eLearning http://www.islamiCity.com/ArabAcademy
Complete Domain & Hosting Solutions www.icDomain.com
Home for Muslim Tunes www.icTunes.com
Islamic Video Collections www.islamiTV.com
IslamiCity Marriage Site www.icMarriage.com