![]() |
Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search |
Old Forum |
|
Advertisement: |
| Middle East | |
| |
|
| << Prev Page of 6 |
| Author | Message |
|
b95000
Senior Member
Joined: 11 July 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1328 |
![]() Posted: 27 October 2005 at 9:15pm |
|
Originally posted by AhmadJoyia
B:
Tell me how this comment is off...the Taliban ruled by fear,
intimidation and murder. No wonder when they threatened the poppy
growers such spectacles as I described worked to keep the growing
down...how tough is this to understand and then to try to spin it into
a derogatory commentary on me personally? Why do this? Why
spin and spin like this? Let's deal with facts and realities,
shall we sir?
Ok brother, let this be the issue as you wish to discuss. You have described that Taliban ruled by fear, intimidation and murder. Let us analyse it through little more rationality than emotionally (keeping the 9/11 factor away). So, as far as their government is concerned, though they had all the
bad things that they did that we all (including my self) accuse them
of, but one thing that must be admitted is, that their
government really implemented the law, without any political
baisness etc. One can ofcourse lable this law to any kind of
"draconion" law etc, but remember that its their own law that
we must pay respect to any independant country as per norms of
international mutual respect. B: That's not the truth brother. The killing and murdering and maiming of others is not something that we need to respect!
B: You're assuming that the
Taliban were benign to those outside its borders (however heinous and
horrible and murderous, abusive and violent they were to their own
people)...I realize earlier that you mentioned 9/11 aside - but that is
IMPOSSIBLE - it is part of reality and AQ is part of reality and the
harboring of AQ naturally involved the whole world in Afghanistan's
internal affairs as AQ had brutally slaughtered hundreds of innocent
Africans in Dar al Salaam and Nairobi in '98 and '99..
B: Are you saying they didn't
murder people in open stadiums when they've been filmed doing so?
Don't you realize that murderous regimes take charge of countries
sometimes - have we not learned from the Germans and the Russians these
lessons? There is no respecting that and why are you bringing up
democracy in reference to the Taliban anyhow?? They're just
absolutely diametrically opposite from democracy! Now, coming to your allusion to the polls and hence freedom
etc. Though, future of these events would essentially depend
upon how long the allied forces are willing to stay "temporarily" over
there (if not permanently), but the fact remain that history shows
that "democracy" can't be implanted from outside but realised from
within the society. Suffice is to know that barring few big cities
of Afghanistan, or more specifically except the capital Kabul, there is
hardly any place where people are yet ready to accept this concept. B: And yet millions voted -
what more than 20 million there and more close to 20 million in
Iraq...millions are voting...and 25% of Afghanistan's loya jirga,
or grand assembly, will be women...how can this not be progress and
steps toward freedom and democracy and rule by the people as opposed to
warlords...I realize that warlords are clinging on - but how long can
they cling on with people voting and involved and moving into the 21st
Century? You say that people aren't willing to accept this - but
what has been the alternative? 30 years war? Are they
willing to accept that? As you rightly pointed out that a process of change of
society can't be realised immediately, I would extend this to say
that it takes centuries to change, but that too, provided the society
itself want a change. Otherwise all implanted concepts would
be rejected sooner the dose of chemotherapy (allied forces) is removed.
I hope and wish that USA and its allies are not planning for the
permanant occupation of the land. Are we? Are we in the making of
yet another "Gotanamo bay" in Afghanistan? I don't think so. So,
what is our purpose to over stay in that country? Where is our main
objective to capture the head of the terrorist gone? In reality, it has
gone to nowhere. Yes, all our efforst are to build strong Afghanistan,
but was that really our main objective? I don't think so. B: Can't you see that to have
democracies rather than these unstable brutal "theocracies" is in
itself achieving victory over terrorism...to have people by the 10s of
millions voting in the Middle East - having their voices heard,
building their countries, having a purpose in their lives besides
blowing themselves up into some 'crusader' or worse some innocent
person that will be broadcast (maybe and increasingly less likely)
across some 'crusaders' TV set is just plain VICTORY in these
matters...do you disagree that to infuse people groups and nations with
purpose is not a successful strategy in the multi-pronged war against
terrorism, battle for freedom and war against poverty?
B: You say it's temporary - but
it need not be temporary..to some extent it's in the hands of the
Afghanis and Iraqis to decide and that is where it should be.. Ground facts remain that the poor people of that country were
suffering from the atrocities of their warlords, and they are still
doing so. As you've pointed out, things
are not utterly transformed in one instant in time...it will take time
for all areas to improve...but there is hope now and much more
involvement and the possibility of much more future
involvement...Afghanis are proud people, to be sure and they will rise
to this challenge... You point toward the future, but don't estimate how far this future
is? Are you talking of few years (a very improbable picture),
or of few decades or of few centuries (most likely
situation)? Yet, lets hope for the best. You are correct - it may well
take a very long time for the greatest of changes - complete equity and
peace...but that does not mean we cannot all work toward that end
together and with the heart of God in mind to that end..
|
|
|
Bruce
Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
AhmadJoyia
Senior Member
Joined: 20 March 2005 Location: Pakistan Online Status: Offline Posts: 1161 |
![]() Posted: 02 November 2005 at 10:02am |
|
O my dear brother b95000 thanks for your reply though without replacing monocle. There is a difference of understanding when killing is "Murder" and when killing is "Punishment", I wish I didn't have to teach it to my brothers. If the killing is not according to law, it is simply a murder, otherwise its a "punishment". Kindly make a note of it. Therefore your reference to website detailing killings in the staduium etc is just what media made it appear as "Murders" but according to the witnesses present their, it was "Punishment". Now coming to your understanding of imported democracy when you say Originally posted by b95000 Though I don't want to go into the debate of pros and cons of democracy, but suffice is to ask is that the major objective for US forces there?
...I realize that warlords are clinging on - but how long can they cling on with people voting and involved and moving into the 21st Century? You say that people aren't willing to accept this - but what has been the alternative? 30 years war? Are they willing to accept that?
..Afghanis are proud people, to be sure and they will rise to this challenge... Yes, ofcourse, and their pride is in their own freedom to act and not through the influence of occupation. Our foremost purpose to be there is to go after the terrorists and maintain law and order situation but not to compromise on them. Are we making any substantial progress or simply trying to make substantial presence over there, possibly for ever. On the more, recent news about secret CIA interrogation cells spread all over the world, beside the incidents of jail abuses, is yet another issue of self reflections as a whole nation than teaching others how to vote? Prioritize yourself.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
b95000
Senior Member
Joined: 11 July 2005 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 1328 |
![]() Posted: 02 November 2005 at 5:35pm |
|
Priorities, huh brother?
Who decides when shooting a woman in the head in a Stadium is NOT murder? Does Sharia speak to such a heinous public killing or give guidelines for how to punish/kill someone? I would say this should be a priority - since you brought it up and since some hear advocate sharia law for certain national legal systems (which ones I'm not sure since there are no 100% Muslim countries.) But perhaps the esoteria of sterilized word choices [punishment or murder] regarding shooting a woman in the head in front of a crowd is just simple justice?...when the US does any sort of killing of killers - people scream and yell about illegal and immoral...so how can you have it both ways - by the way? Who gets to decide? I guess, brother, in your view, the 1.3 B (20%) out of 6.5 Billion in the world, get to decide what is moral and not... The rest be damned and just don't get in the way of the morality police? And certainly do NOT get caught and do NOT get punished...Wow, with such power over life and death I sure hope the 'morality police' never get corrupt... [moderator edited] comparing Islam and shariah law to saddam
hussein is not acceptable as well as Insulting the Islamic faith in general. Edited by rami |
|
|
Bruce
Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
FeistyNomad
Starter
Joined: 04 July 2005 Location: Australia Online Status: Offline Posts: 6 |
![]() Posted: 07 December 2005 at 8:39pm |
|
Originally posted by UmTayyab
I must interject regarding women who flaunt the Shariah, women who work for agencies who claim to help the people, only to work against them as spies and mischief makers, women who take the kufaar as their awliah, women who go on radio and broadcast music, women who appear beautified and uncovered on television beside men and behave like the kufaar in a nation that has attempted to install pure Shariah (even though they haven't had a chance to properly educate the masses and most citizens are still illiterate, not only in reading and writing, but in knowledge of their own Islam)... they made their beds, let them die in them. I am a woman, and I am a Muslimah. Any woman who makes war against the Shariah makes war against me. Don't expect me to mourn them or waste my time looking for their killers. And they call me feisty! Mabrooks on such a passionate post. Perhaps I should frequent this site more often.
|
|
IP Logged |
|
| << Prev Page of 6 |
|
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
Note: The 99 names of Allah avatars are courtesy of www.arthafez.com
Advertisement: