Why not? You made the claim that he was not.

Instead of pretending to really be investigating, why not stop with all of the silly skeptical questions and come out with your position and argue your case?

Thats what a debate is. You want to interrogate.

There is a difference.

I'm looking for specifics not generalities.  Do you have anything specific?  I thought Muslims believe Satan is merely a jinn and Muhammad was for people and jinn.  did I get that wrong?

Remember my car salesman example?  If I want lie about something, I tell you a lot of true and throw in the lie or two.  Could that be what the "voice" was doing?  Also I still can not find anything about how Muhammad figured out that the unidentified "voice" was Angel Gabriel.

So in other words you can not give even ONE example where I posted something that is not true or in error!!!

That means I have a better "batting average" than the Quran!

And what difference does that have on what I stated?

Please explain the problem you are implying.

The theolgical antithesis to Shaytan is inherent in the outcomes of Islam:

1) tauheed (the oneness of Gd without implicitness)

2) the develpment of civilization

3) development of society

4) development of family

4) the Quran and Sunnah

And remember my point and explanation that it was a false analogy. This is what usually happens when you ignore my points. You can then continue to recycle them as if the are valid.

I already covered it as a false analogy. Now you can pretend it was never mentioned and demand a rehash from me, and if I refuse, you can claim a victory.

You are not as clever as you think you are.