Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin  Old ForumOld Forum  Twitter  Facebook
Advertisement:
         

Current Events
 IslamiCity Forum - Islamic Discussion Forum : Politics : Current Events
Message Icon Topic: Just For NATO MacCredibility . . . Post Reply Post New Topic
Author Message
Whisper
Male Other
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 25 July 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4752
Quote Whisper Replybullet Topic: Just For NATO MacCredibility . . .
    Posted: 20 September 2006 at 8:35am

. . . we must keep roasting ze Afghanos!

Browne fears deeper Afghan conflict

Richard Norton-Taylor
Wednesday September 20, 2006
The Guardian

Des Browne, the defence secretary, warned yesterday that the violence in southern Afghanistan, where British and other Nato troops are engaged in fierce fighting with the Taliban, could escalate into a deeper and more serious conflict.

 

In a frank assessment of the task facing troops, during which he contradicted comments by his predecessor, John Reid, Mr Browne said there was "still much we must learn" about the Taliban-led insurgency. He said Nato's mission in Afghanistan was vital for its credibility. And in a candid reference to cross-border infiltration by insurgents, he said that Pakistan was "part of the problem" as well as part of the solution.

 

Mr Browne said there were signs that Afghans were tired of the constant fighting, and that the Taliban hardcore consisted of only about 1,000 people. But he added that its leaders were "adept at forming alliances of convenience with the drug barons and criminal gangs".

 

"Together they recruit foot soldiers from among the poor, ordinary Afghan tribesmen" who fought because they were paid to, often with drug money. The foot soldiers made up the majority of those fighting British and Canadian troops.

 

"If we cannot persuade them to put down their guns, then we will struggle to make progress, and there will be a real danger that their deaths will motivate others to join the fight, and potentially turn this into a conflict of a different kind," he said.

 

Mr Browne did not spell out the dangers in his speech to the Royal United Services Institute in London, first details of which were revealed in the Guardian yesterday. But analysts have warned that the conflict could attract more al-Qaida-inspired Islamists and develop into a battle of the scale of that in Iraq, or even a fully fledged civil war.

 

Answering questions on the role of British soldiers in Afghanistan, Mr Browne said it was unhelpful to distinguish between counter-terrorist and counter-insurgency operations. Soldiers were not asked whether they were shooting at insurgents or terrorists, he said.

 

Yet in April, while announcing the deployment of British troops, Mr Reid, now the home secretary, went out of his way to make such a distinction. "There is a fundamental difference between our mission of support to reconstruction and stabilisation, which might include some counter-insurgency operations for defensive purposes, and the counter-terrorism mission ... led by the US," he said. "Theirs [the US] is essentially a 'search-and-destroy' mission in which the finding and defeat of terrorists is the overriding aim ... Ours is firmly centred on the reconstruction effort."

 

In the event, British troops have taken the fight to the Taliban in the northern part of Helmand province, mainly at the behest of US commanders and Afghan leaders. Mr Browne admitted yesterday that little progress had been made in reconstructing southern Afghanistan.

 

He also said that countering narcotics was not a task for British soldiers, although Afghanistan is the source of 90% of heroin on British streets. "We have not sent our troops there to seize opium or eradicate poppies," he said.

 

British defence officials say this would provoke even more hostility towards British troops. Persuading farmers to cultivate alternative crops is the task of the Afghan authorities and civilian development agencies, they stress.

Mr Browne criticised Britain's allies who were not prepared to send troops to Afghanistan. "Nato is an alliance. When it decides to use military force, all partners should be prepared to face equal risk." Britain has almost 5,000 troops in country. "They are working in arduous conditions, around the clock, up to and sometimes beyond the bounds of stamina and endurance."

IP IP Logged
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. This forum is offered to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization.
If there is any issue with any of the postings please email to icforum at islamicity.com or if you are a forum's member you can use the report button.

Note: The 99 names of Allah avatars are courtesy of www.arthafez.com

Advertisement:



Sponsored by:
Islamicity Membership Program:
IslamiCity Donation Program  http://www.islamicity.com/Donate
IslamiCity Arabic eLearning http://www.islamiCity.com/ArabAcademy
Complete Domain & Hosting Solutions www.icDomain.com
Home for Muslim Tunes www.icTunes.com
Islamic Video Collections www.islamiTV.com
IslamiCity Marriage Site www.icMarriage.com