![]() |
Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search |
Old Forum |
|
Advertisement: |
| Interfaith Dialogue | |
Topic: Pork is forbidden in Islam and Christianity. |
|
| << Prev Page of 7 Next >> |
| Author | Message |
|
Reepicheep
Senior Member
Joined: 06 November 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 235 |
![]() Posted: 08 June 2012 at 7:59am |
|
Honeto, you say you believe that eating pork is a relatively minor sin in Islam because, using your terminology, it causes only moral hurt. From what I've been able to determine, every muslim scholar without exception (past and present) agrees that there is no earthly punishment for a muslim who eats pork, so certainly it can be said that muslims believe that eating pork is a sin which is strictly between muslims and God, and will be dealt with in the afterlife.
But, honeto, where you go off track is when you claim that muslims believe that incest, too, is a relatively minor sin because it, too, causes only moral hurt.
Let's use the example of your father raping your daughter. If a pregnancy resulted, your daughter would most likely give birth to a horribly deformed baby that would die shortly after birth or, at a minimum, suffer severe mental and physical health problems.
How can you claim that the rape of your daughter and subsequent pregnancy are a minor moral hurt which, like eating pork, should not be punished by earthly courts???
By the way, muslim scholars don't agree with you. In fact, they argue the opposite and say that rape should be punished more severely if the victim is a relative of the rapist. So, who is correct, you or the muslim scholars? Edited by Reepicheep - 08 June 2012 at 8:02am |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
honeto
Senior Member
Joined: 20 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2340 |
![]() Posted: 09 June 2012 at 5:24pm |
|
Reep i cheep,
I see your problem. You are not reading neither my answers nor your own posts, at least that's the impression I get. Are you afraid of the reality? is it true that you were a bast-- child like more than 40% of your fellow countryman? were you born out of wedlock to your mother? what place you have in front of Christian church according to the Bible? God loves you and I believe you should not pay for what your parents did, don't you agree? Why you and your several generations are to be outcasts and not enter even the church? please remember God loves you, if you did not choose to be a bast-- kid, you don't have to pay. love you, Hasan Edited by honeto - 09 June 2012 at 5:28pm |
|
|
39:64 Proclaim: Is it some one other than God that you order me to worship, O you ignorant ones?"
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Reepicheep
Senior Member
Joined: 06 November 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 235 |
![]() Posted: 09 June 2012 at 9:20pm |
|
honeto wrote: is it true that you were a bast-- child like more than 40% of your fellow countryman?
I'm curious, which country do you claim I live in?
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
honeto
Senior Member
Joined: 20 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2340 |
![]() Posted: 11 June 2012 at 1:40pm |
|
In 2003 it stood at 42% in the US. It is probably over 50% now here in the US, most Western countries are pretty close, some a bit less, some more. I thought you live in US, but that was jsut a guess. I live here in US but I was not born here. It is possible you live in Saudi Arabia, but you were born in a Western country?
Hasan
Edited by honeto - 11 June 2012 at 1:42pm |
|
|
39:64 Proclaim: Is it some one other than God that you order me to worship, O you ignorant ones?"
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Reepicheep
Senior Member
Joined: 06 November 2006 Online Status: Offline Posts: 235 |
![]() Posted: 11 June 2012 at 2:18pm |
|
honeto wrote: is it true that you were a bast-- child like more than 40% of your fellow countryman? were you born out of wedlock to your mother?
honeto also wrote: I thought you live in US, but that was just a guess. I live here in US
The reason I ask where you think I live is that you made some very serious accusations about my mother. Since I have never talked about her, I assume you know nothing about her, correct? You don't know if she is Christian or Muslim, you don't know if she lives in Saudi Arabia or Germany, you don't know if she is alive or dead, etc. For all you know, she is a direct descendant of Mohammad and one of the most pure women who ever lived, but since you thought she was a US citizen, that was sufficient justification for you to insult her and to make very serious accusations about her character. Correct?
For now, I will neither confirm nor deny that my mother and I are US citizens. The important issue, from your point of view, is that since you thought she is American, by insulting her you were perfoming a righteous act for which you will be richly rewarded on the day of judgement. Correct?
But that leads to several interesting questions. You seem to think that it is a righteous act for a devout muslim like yourself to say unspeakably vile, sick, things about any mothers (including, presumably, muslim mothers) who happen to have US citizenship. What is the Islamic basis for your belief that insulting American mothers is a righteous act? Can you provide us with any hadith or passages from the koran that prove this is a righteous act?
**************
It is interesting to compare the Sunni and Shia beliefs RE: whether Allah is pleased when muslims insult mothers. About a month ago, on the SHIACHAT forum, a shia muslim poster who insulted another poster's mother received an immediate lifetime ban from the website, even though he had been posting on SHIACHAT for years and was one of their most active members. (incidently, the muslim whose mother was being insulted was a Sunni; I was pleased that the Shia moderators did what was right and sided with the Sunni muslim instead of the Shia muslim).
On Islamicity, which is a Sunni site, there is apparently no punishment for posters who insult mothers. I wonder why Shia muslims respect mothers, while Sunni muslims apparently don't. Edited by Reepicheep - 11 June 2012 at 4:09pm |
|
IP Logged |
|
|
honeto
Senior Member
Joined: 20 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2340 |
![]() Posted: 13 June 2012 at 4:37pm |
|
Reepicheep,
you point finger at others and forget to see your own acts. Go back and read what you first wrote about my deceased fahter, and my innocent little daughters. I know it only hurts when someone else do it to you. When you do it to others its alright and fun, you thought.
And I realize I was wrong for what I did in response to first you saying unspeakable, sick things about my father who you did not know has passed away many many years ago, and never saw my kids about whom you said unpeakable and sick things without knowing them. That was a shame, and if you forgot, you wrote that first before I came up with what I admit was wrong. I was uncomfortable to write, but it was in response to your insults against my innocent daughers and deceased father.
I regret that I fell into your trap or lowering myself to your level in saying what I said.
The data that I provided was true, only my assumption about your mother was not, for which I ask Allah's forgiveness. And I ask Allah's help to not fall into traps of Satan again.
As far as the subject, according to the Bible and Quran, pork, like many other things and acts is Haram/forbidden to eat or touch for a believer.
I don't see anyone taking the issue of children out of wedlock as insulting here in the West. Almost everyone sleep around before getting married save a few. Many people have multiple partners sometimes while married. A child out of wedlock has become as normal as pink color for man.
What I am saying is that all of that is against the teachings of the Bible that these people believe in. The Bible has called such children (who are born out fo wedlock) as illegitmate and that they should not be allowed in congregation for so many generations. That is not my verdict, the Bible said that.
Hasan
Edited by honeto - 13 June 2012 at 5:00pm |
|
|
39:64 Proclaim: Is it some one other than God that you order me to worship, O you ignorant ones?"
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
honeto
Senior Member
Joined: 20 March 2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 2340 |
![]() Posted: 13 June 2012 at 5:02pm |
|
Originally posted by Reepicheep
Reepecheep,
Honeto, you say you believe that eating pork is a relatively minor sin in Islam because, using your terminology, it causes only moral hurt. From what I've been able to determine, every muslim scholar without exception (past and present) agrees that there is no earthly punishment for a muslim who eats pork, so certainly it can be said that muslims believe that eating pork is a sin which is strictly between muslims and God, and will be dealt with in the afterlife. But, honeto, where you go off track is when you claim that muslims believe that incest, too, is a relatively minor sin because it, too, causes only moral hurt.
Let's use the example of your father raping your daughter. If a pregnancy resulted, your daughter would most likely give birth to a horribly deformed baby that would die shortly after birth or, at a minimum, suffer severe mental and physical health problems.
How can you claim that the rape of your daughter and subsequent pregnancy are a minor moral hurt which, like eating pork, should not be punished by earthly courts???
By the way, muslim scholars don't agree with you. In fact, they argue the opposite and say that rape should be punished more severely if the victim is a relative of the rapist. So, who is correct, you or the muslim scholars? read what you wrote, what a shame, do you see it?
Hasan
|
|
|
39:64 Proclaim: Is it some one other than God that you order me to worship, O you ignorant ones?"
|
|
IP Logged |
|
|
Matt Browne
Male Christian Senior Member
Joined: 19 April 2010 Location: Germany Online Status: Offline Posts: 773 |
![]() Posted: 16 June 2012 at 6:49am |
|
Hasan, would Jesus have called children born out of wedlock as illegitimate? Instead Jesus said: "Give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s. (Mark 12:17)
Unlike Judaism and Islam, Christianity is not a religion of the law.
Jesus lay the foundation for the modern secular principle: laws are made
by people for the people. Members of parliaments who are Christians can
have opinions and influence the law-making process, but their view is
only one view of several. Today children born out of wedlock are not seen as illegitimate. The main reason is that this hurts the feelings of the child. Jesus wants us to obey "Caesar's laws". Today Caesar stands for elected representatives.
Edited by Matt Browne - 16 June 2012 at 6:50am |
|
|
A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt |
|
IP Logged |
|
| << Prev Page of 7 Next >> |
|
||
Forum Jump |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
|
Note: The 99 names of Allah avatars are courtesy of www.arthafez.com
Advertisement: