|Active Topics Memberlist Calendar Search Help|
|Register Login Old Forum|
|IslamiCity Forum - Islamic Discussion Forum : Politics : World Politics|
|Topic: U.S./Israel at it again|
Joined: 05 February 2012
Online Status: Offline
| Topic: U.S./Israel at it again
Posted: 15 February 2012 at 8:27am
I got this off of www.whatreallyhappened.com
Surprise, Surprise: Navy Seals Don't Want To Be Sacrificial Lambs In New False Flag
Acclaimed actor, humanitarian, and American patriot Ed Asner provided further proof on the Alex Jones show on Monday, February 13, that the bad guys in Washington and Tel Aviv are planning to stage a new false flag attack and blame it on Iran to get World War III up and going. Kurt Nimmo writes:
Appearing on the Alex Jones Show on Monday, Emmy Award-winning actor Ed Asner said Navy Seals have told him military action against Iran is forthcoming and will be preceded by a false flag attack.
Asner told Alex and his nationally syndicated radio show audience that the Seals are attempting to alert the American people about the prospect of a false flag operation and “more foreign escapades” before the establishment media “starts brainwashing us.”
Asner gave few details about his sources, but his information confirms suspicions held by many in the global alternative media that Israel and Washington are engineering a new false flag to use as an excuse to totally isolate Iran from the international community and start a massive bombing campaign against its military, civilian, and nuclear installations.
Basically, the plan is to bury Persia in the fires of hell and advance U.S.-Israeli hegemony over the whole region.
Tony Cartalucci reminded the world of the West's game plan against Iran in his article, "String of Global Bombings Blamed on Iran." Here is an excerpt:
"The problem ultimately is that the United States and Israel have put to paper a conspiracy to provoke a war with Iran by crushing it economically, attacking it covertly, surrounding it militarily, undermining it politically, and even going as far as funding, training, and arming terrorists to murder the Iranian people themselves. Nothing the West says now, even if it were true, without absolute, irrefutable evidence to back it up, is worth the paper it is written on. Every alleged attack, every pretext they put forward, every excuse for this clearly unprovoked war, must first be suspected as a manufactured provocation until otherwise proven by independent sources - excluding Wall Street proxies like Thailand's current government and the NATO-bent officials of Tbilisi, Georgia.
What should worry readers the most is that if the US and Israel really are carrying out a global campaign of false-flag attacks to finally garner their elusive justification for an otherwise indefensible act of aggression, how far they are willing to go if public opinion fails to be swayed by these suspicious incidents?"
While Israel has been designated by the international financiers in Washington and London to be the setup man, the war on Iran is essentially a tag-team effort. In fake wrestling, the weaker partner first enters the ring to annoy and irritate the other side, then once he gets beaten up and loses his energy, the stronger partner bails him out and makes the other team tap out. It seems like the war planners and strategists in the Pentagon are using this wrestling tactic against Iran. America is the Big Show, and Israel is the pest with the mask on that jumps around the ring like a lunatic.
Another way of looking at the game of deception that the U.S. and Israel are playing would be to imagine a Big Brother and Little Brother pretending to be at odds with each other in front of the parents but they are secretly plotting behind their backs. In this tragicomedy play, Washington is the older brother who is letting the younger and more aggressive brother take the first shots against Iran. After Israel swings and misses, Washington will step in, pull up its sleeves, and try to knock Iran out of the Middle Eastern park.
All the while Washington is desperately trying to pull the wool over the world's eyes. But it is failing to convince the global population that it can't pull back Israel from attacking Iran and that it does not want a new war with Iran. This propaganda strategy is totally transparent and ineffective. The idea that Washington does not want a war with Iran goes against reality. The world knows that Washington and Israel dance to the tune of the same financial masters in London who hijacked America in 1913, before the era of the great world wars.
Israel acts like the mad dog on the world stage for public consumption, while Washington plays the part of the bewildered owner who can't train his dog properly. Don't be fooled. There is an invisible leash on Israel. Sure, it can piss on the Palestinians, and bark at Iran, but at the end of the day, this dog is going back inside his owner's warm house.
The latest bombings in Georgia, India, and Thailand, all regimes that are in the NATO-US-Israel alliance, suggest that a new major false flag catastrophe is in the works. This is just the preparatory phase.
The path to World War III is being cleared. Who will stop this madness? The Generals?
There is a belief out there that the Generals in America are the good guys and the politicians and civilians are the bad guys. But that's not true. Generally speaking, Generals are not heroes. They are servile yes men. So don't expect the Generals to intervene, stop a new false flag attack in America or the Persian Gulf, and save America from financial destruction.
If the Generals at the Pentagon did not want world war three, then they would've exposed the Israel Lobby, the criminal international banksters, and the neocon traitors by now.
But that has not happened because the Generals tell themselves that it is easier to take out Iran with nukes than destroy the Israel Lobby, the neocon fascists, and their financial masters. This is not true, of course, but cowards need to make excuses to save their own manhood. So they're going along for the ride without making a fuss.
Generals of all countries are not honourable patriots, but cold-blooded murderers and serpents. They only know murder and deceit. Don't expect these apes of warfare to suddenly see the light and evolve. Generals sacrifice millions of lives to achieve the most evil political ends. They waste souls the way you and I waste toilet paper. The rank and file literally mean *****to them. In WWI, generals from Germany, France, and England sacrificed soldiers like they were making them in factories. In the Iran-Iraq War, Iranian generals used young soldiers like junkyard toys.
Generals are paid to kill and lie in the name of empire, not defend the homeland and guard the innocent from the wicked. Top Generals from all countries, no matter if it is America, Iran, Israel, England, China, or Pakistan, are power-hungry thugs who don't deserve any love or loyalty. Only the soulless scum go up the hierarchy of evil and destruction in the military in any system of government.
The military is "a living monument to tyranny," said the German poet Heinrich von Kleist. The only good soldier is a soldier who has been kicked out of the military. But who wants to be kicked out of an institution after licking all the right boots, doing all the right things, and saying all the right words? Generals expect to be rewarded for their service to evil.
So if you think Generals and the high-ranking men in uniform are misunderstood angels who will save America and the world from destruction, dream on. They're complicit in 9/11 and in the murder of Pat Tillman along with thousands of other patriotic soldiers. Why would they sacrifice their lives and their careers by going after the neocon murderers and Israeli terrorists this late in the game? Out of love for country? Come on, let's not be naive
The Generals will not step in the way of a false flag attack and stop an Iran War because they don't have the balls to do it. They can blow up entire cities and massacre innocent civilians, but they can't stand up to the demonic power of the totalitarian state.
If you're praying for angels to save this world, the last place you'll find them is in the military, which is Satan's home turf.
Joined: 05 February 2012
Online Status: Offline
|Posted: 23 February 2012 at 7:46am|
Here is another good post I got off www.whatreallyhappened.com
FBI organizes almost all terror plots in the US
Get short URL
email story to a friendprint version
Published: 23 August, 2011, 01:02
Edited: 09 September, 2011, 11:34
FBI organizes almost all terror plots in the US
TAGS:Crime, Meeting, Scandal, Terrorism, Psychology, Corruption, USA
The Federal Bureau of Investigation employs upwards of 15,000 undercover agents today, ten times what they had on the roster back in 1975.
If you think that’s a few spies too many — spies earning as much as $100,000 per assignment — one doesn’t have to go too deep into their track record to see their accomplishments. Those agents are responsible for an overwhelming amount of terrorist stings that have stopped major domestic catastrophes in the vein of 9/11 from happening on American soil.
Another thing those agents are responsible for, however, is plotting those very schemes.
The FBI has in recent years used trained informants not just to snitch on suspected terrorists, but to set them up from the get-go. A recent report put together by Mother Jones and the Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California-Berkley analyses some striking statistics about the role of FBI informants in terrorism cases that the Bureau has targeted in the decade since the September 11 attacks.
The report reveals that the FBI regularly infiltrates communities where they suspect terrorist-minded individuals to be engaging with others. Regardless of their intentions, agents are sent in to converse within the community, find suspects that could potentially carry out “lone wolf” attacks and then, more or less, encourage them to do so. By providing weaponry, funds and a plan, FBI-directed agents will encourage otherwise-unwilling participants to plot out terrorist attacks, only to bust them before any events fully materialize.
Additionally, one former high-level FBI officials speaking to Mother Jones says that, for every informant officially employed by the bureau, up to three unofficial agents are working undercover.
The FBI has used those informants to set-up and thus shut-down several of the more high profile would-be attacks in recent years. The report reveals that the Washington DC Metro bombing plot, the New York City subway plot, the attempt to blow up Chicago’s Sears Tower and dozens more were all orchestrated by FBI agents. In fact, reads the report, only three of the more well-known terror plots of the last decade weren’t orchestrated by FBI-involved agents.
The report reveals that in many of the stings, important meetings between informants and the unknowing participants are left purposely unrecorded, as to avoid any entrapment charges that could cause the case to be dismissed. Perhaps the most high-profile of the FBI-proposed plots was the case of the Newburgh 4. Around an hour outside of New York City, an informant infiltrated a Muslim community and engaged four local men to carry out a series of attacks. Those men may have never actually carried out an attack, but once the informant offered them a plot and a pair of missiles, they agreed. Defense attorneys cried “entrapment,” but the men still were sentenced to 25 years apiece.
"The problem with the cases we're talking about is that defendants would not have done anything if not kicked in the ass by government agents," Martin Stolar tells Mother Jones. Stolar represented the suspect involved in a New York City bombing plot that was set-up by FBI agents. "They're creating crimes to solve crimes so they can claim a victory in the war on terror." For their part, the FBI says this method is a plan for "preemption," "prevention" and "disruption."
The report also reveals that, of the 500-plus prosecutions of terrorism-related cases they analyzed, nearly half of them involved the use of informants, many of whom worked for the FBI in exchange for money or to work off criminal charges. Of the 158 prosecutions carried out, 49 defendants participated in plots that agent provocateurs arranged on behalf of the FBI.
Experts note that the chance of winning a terrorism-related trial, entrapment or not, is near impossible. "The plots people are accused of being part of — attacking subway systems or trying to bomb a building — are so frightening that they can overwhelm a jury," David Cole, a Georgetown University law professor, tells Mother Jones. Since 9/11, almost two-thirds of the cases linked to terrorism have ended with guilty pleas. “They don't say, 'I've been entrapped,' or, 'I was immature,’” a retired FBI official remarks.
All of this and those guilty pleas often stem for just being in the right place at the wrong time. Farhana Khera of the group Muslim Advocate notes that agents go into mosques on “fishing expeditions” just to see where they can get interest in the community. "The FBI is now telling agents they can go into houses of worship without probable cause," says Khera. "That raises serious constitutional issues."
From the set-up to the big finish, the whole sting operation is ripe with constitutional issues such as that. A decade since 9/11, however, the FBI is reaching through whatever means it can pull together to keep terrorists — or whom they think could someday become one — from ever hurting America.
Joined: 06 November 2006
Online Status: Offline
|Posted: 23 February 2012 at 8:12am|
whatreallyhappened.com is a wonderful website for those of us who refuse to believe the lies spread by the zionist newspapers. It is the only place to go to read true stories.
Aliens to come to Earth to enslave and eat humans because we refuse to listen to Al Gore
Why is it that the jews at all the other news sources refuse to cover important stories like this???
Joined: 05 February 2012
Online Status: Offline
|Posted: 23 February 2012 at 9:29am|
From www.whatreallyhappened.com: Israel at it again via AIPAC
AIPAC Declares War
by Philip Giraldi, February 23, 2012
| Print This | Share This | Antiwar Forum
The American people don’t particularly want a new war in the Middle East, but apparently Congress and Washington’s most powerful lobby do. Thirty-two senators have co-sponsored a resolution that will constrain the White House from adopting any policy vis-à-vis Iran’s “nuclear weapons capability” that amounts to “containment.” The senators include the familiar figures of Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, both of whom have persistently called for military action. They and the other senators have presented their proposal in a particularly deceptive fashion, asserting that they are actually supporting the White House position, which they are not. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta repeated on Feb. 16 that Iran does not have and is not currently building a nuclear device. Before Christmas, he stated clearly that the “red line” for the United States is actual Iranian possession of a nuclear weapon. Even Israel’s intelligence services agree that Iran is not building a bomb. What we are seeing play out in Congress is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) position, which is that Iran has already crossed a “red line.” The AIPAC argument will no doubt be spelled out in more detail next month at the group’s annual convention in the nation’s capital, a meeting that will be addressed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and will attract nearly all of Washington’s power brokers.
Rejection of containment in this context and as spelled out in the resolution means that the United States will be forced to go to war if Iran attains the capability to put together a nuclear weapon. Indeed, one might argue that the United States should be at war already, based on the resolution. “Capability” is one of those particularly useful expressions that is extremely elastic and can be interpreted subjectively. By most standards, Iran already has the technical know-how to make a nuclear bomb and has most of the materials on hand to put one together, assuming it can enrich the uranium it possesses to the required level. The Iranians may not, in fact, have the engineering skills to do so, and the task of creating a small, sophisticated device that can be mounted on a ballistic missile is certainly far beyond their current capabilities and probably unachievable given the costs involved and the poor state of their economy.
There are about 50 countries in the world that have the capability to produce a nuclear weapon if they chose to do so, making Iran far from unique but for its persistence as a thorn in the side of Israel and Israel’s powerful lobby in the United States. In other words, Iran does not have to actually produce a nuclear weapon for it to be subject to attack by either Israel or the United States. It only has to continue to be an irritant for Israel.
The new threat of war takes the Bush doctrine of preemption to a whole new level. Some sources in the Obama administration are anonymously warning that war with Iran is nearly certain and are predicting it to break out in late summer. That would be just before the presidential election, a time in which Obama will be seeking desperately to seize the high ground on Israel’s security from whomever the Republicans nominate. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will not even have to mimic Colin Powell by going to the United Nations to seek authorization for an attack using false and fabricated information. Everyone can agree that the mullahs do not actually have a weapon and may not even want to acquire one, but it’s fine to bomb them anyway. The U.S. Senate approves, so off we go to another misadventure in the Middle East
Without a doubt, President Obama is to blame for this shameful state of affairs for showing every sign of weakness whenever confronted by Netanyahu and AIPAC. We should almost certainly expect nothing less than a personal and presidential kowtow at the AIPAC conference next month, a complete surrender that Netanyahu will no doubt receive in his usual ungracious fashion. Even President George W. Bush was able to stand up to the Israelis and forbid an attack on Iran, but now the United States has boxed itself into a corner diplomatically speaking, without any real ability to influence Tel Aviv to cease and desist.
Israel’s prime minister is continuously ramping up the rhetoric, calling Iran a threat to the entire world and suggesting that his country will soon retaliate against recent Iranian-directed terrorist attacks. The bombing in New Delhi and attempted bombings in Tbilisi and Thailand targeting Israelis are a major escalation of the tit-for-tat terrorism between Israel and Iran. Israel has killed four Iranian scientists using Mujahedin-e Khalq agents and possibly relying on intelligence provided by Washington. Israel’s involvement in recruiting Jundallah-Balochi militants using officers pretending to be American CIA, referred to as a false-flag operation, was recently revealed in the U.S. media, though the story quickly disappeared from sight, as is almost invariably the case when dealing with Israel.
But Iran is now signaling that it too has surrogates and is willing to respond in kind. An interesting subplot is the location of two of the attacks in India and Georgia. Iran certainly has covert resources among India’s large Muslim population and also within the significant Azeri minority in Georgia. Israel has been courting India and sees a strategic relationship developing, with the two united against Muslim insurgency. Israel also has a not-so-secret military and intelligence base in Georgia and has recently expanded into nearby Azerbaijan, where it has established an intelligence listening post at an airbase. Iran is surrounded by Israeli operational initiatives and is now signaling that it has had enough and is prepared to strike back. A back-and-forth series of assassinations is particularly dangerous, as it could produce the type of incident that Israel could exploit to preemptively attack, not unlike the fallout from the assassination of a certain archduke in Serbia in 1914. The conflict would undoubtedly ignite the region and inevitably involve the United States, particularly if Congress and the media have any say in the matter.
The United States is powerless to prevent such an outcome in spite of a clear national interest to do so. President Obama has insisted, probably sincerely, that he doesn’t want a war and maintains that he is willing to talk to Iran. But he has nevertheless refused to do so despite several overtures from Tehran to start a dialogue, preferring to deal through surrogates. He has told the Israelis repeatedly that they should not attack Iran, but he keeps insisting that “all options are on the table” in dealing with the mullahs, completely confusing the issue for most observers. What is needed is a clear signal from the White House that the U.S. interest is that there should not be a war and that Washington will not get involved no matter who starts it. If the Israelis know they will have to go it alone, they will not attack. Unfortunately, in an election year, such a position is unlikely because the White House will want to present itself as a close friend of Israel and tough against “rogue” states like Iran.
You might well ask how the United States wound up in such a pickle. Many Americans are beginning to wake up to the fact that it is disgraceful that a small country like Israel should be able to dictate U.S. foreign policy in a key part of the world, but the current situation is actually far worse than that. This is the case of a foreign government’s lobby consisting largely of American citizens using its clout to avoid registering as a foreign agent while narrowing the policy options through its friends in Congress and the media in such a way as to make war inevitable. Some might call it treason. Such people should be denounced and marginalized before they send off another wave of young Americans to die on their behalf while beggaring the rest of us, but instead, senators and representatives will be lining up to cheer them in a month’s time. George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison must be spinning in their graves.
|You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Note: The 99 names of Allah avatars are courtesy of www.arthafez.com