Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin  Old ForumOld Forum  Twitter  Facebook
Advertisement:
         

Interfaith Dialogue
 IslamiCity Forum - Islamic Discussion Forum : Religion - Islam : Interfaith Dialogue
Message Icon Topic: Every living thing made from water. Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 36 Next >>
Author Message
Beebok
Male Islam
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2012
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Quote Beebok Replybullet Posted: 17 June 2012 at 9:40pm

" The Quran does not give accurate examples of natural phenomena that scientists discovered later. "

LOL, that is amazing how disbelievers can deny what is right in front of their eyes.

Quran 6:111,

{

Even if We sent the angels down to them, and caused the dead to speak with them, and ranged all things in front of them, they would still not believe, unless God willed otherwise.

}

No, the accurate examples of natural phenomenon are right there in front of your eyes as are the other proofs, but you can not see it.

Quran 6:110

{

We will turn away their hearts and eyes from the truth because they refused to believe in it at first. And so we shall leave them in their overweening arrogance, blindly stumbling to and fro.

}

You accuse Muslims of arrogance, but there God is saying who is truly arrogant. According to God, the arrogant are those who deny the proofs of Islam because they have blinded themselves with denial.

You say Muslims like me are arrogant. God says that those who deny his proofs are arrogant. Who shall I believe? A mere mortal or God? I shall believe God.

Do not say that the proofs are not there. Rather say the truth, that you are unable to see the proofs.

Quran 6:24-25

{

. . . they will deceive themselves . . . We have cast veils over their hearts and made them hard of hearing lest they understand your words. They will believe in none of Our signs, even if they see them, one and all.

}

------------

"The Isra and Mi'raj are the most important myths in Islam."

That's interesting that you have no problem stating that beliefs in Islam are myths, but then claim emotional injury when Christianity is called false.

-------

A problem only arises if followers of one religion claim that the spiritual truths of their own religion is the only truth. Modern Christians don't make this claim anymore.

Uh, actually I’m hearing modern Christians claim that Islam is a false religion very frequently.

Preacher Franklin Graham called Islam a religion of evil.

I heard preacher Chriswell refer to Islam as a “curse.”

I’ve heard them refer to Muhammad as a pervert and demon possessed.

Another modern Christian burned the Quran in public.

But that does not make me want to fight them.

Quran 6:33-35

{

We know too well that what they say grieves you. It is not you they are disbelieving; the evil-doers deny God’s own revelations.

}

It just makes me want to debate them.

Quran 46:35

{

Bear with them in patience . . . .

}

-------------

"...there's nothing more hurtful than labeling Christianity and Hinduism as false religions."

First, I'll just have to live with that because labeling Christianity as false is part of Islam.

Quran 5:72-73,

{

Unbelievers are those who say that God is the Messiah, the son of Mary

. . .

Unbelievers are those who say that God is one of three

 }

Quran 3:85,

{ And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him. }

And labeling polytheistic idol worship (as seen in Hinduism) as false is also a part of Islam.

Quran 46:5

{ Who is more in error than the ones who pray to idols . . . ? }

I'm just repeating what God has revealed.

If you don't like the revelation, then you can complain to God, astaghfurillah.

Second, as far as words, your Western secularism is full of insults against Islam and Muslims (e.g. Muslim men treat women badly, etc).

So what?

I laugh at such insults because I know what the truth is. We shall see on the Day of Judgment.

But for someone representing Western secularism to complain about insults coming from Islam in the context of the Wests' insults against Islam and Muslims is doubly laughable in its hypocrisy.

Third, you have no problem labeling the beliefs of Muslims as myths (implying falseness).

Fourth, you don't seem to really believe in Christianity yourself other than as just poetry and fable, so you yourself see it as false.

----------

"It's the kind of words that undermine world peace."

What undermines peace are things like the greed to covet oil such as the USA’s bombing of Iraq's water treatment facilities in 1991 and sanctions which led to wide spread cholera and other diseases which murdered 500,000 Iraqi children in just a few years.

That’s the sort of thing that undermines peace.

US secretary of state Madeline Albright later told Leslie Stahl that it was “worth it.”

Saying that Christianity and Hinduism are false just opens the door for polite debate.

To claim that it starts war in light of the things that really start wars is categorically false.

{ God does not forbid you to be kind and equitable to those who have not made war on your religion or driven you from your homes } Quran 60:9 

--------

"It reeks of Muslim narcissism and arrogance."

We shall see on the Day of Judgment who was arrogant.

Will it be those Muslims who humbly accepted God's message, or those who denied it while pridefully living in opulence built on plundering the world through centuries of imperialism and neo-colonialism while narcissistically imagining themselves as humane and enlightened?

God has revealed in the Quran those who will be truly judged as arrogant. It will not be up to you or me to decide. It is God who will decide who was arrogant. George W. Bush said he was the decider. No, it is God who is the Decider. Not you, not Bush, not me.

---------

"Religious narcissism impedes modernity. "

That deference and apotheosis of modernity (Western secularism) and the automatic assumption that "modernity" is the right way is itself arrogant.

I haven't seen anything more narcissistic than Western secularism’s image of itself as the right way and humane while it debases itself in debauchery that is a throwback to ancient paganism, child sacrifice through abortion, every type of deviance, high-tech piracy through global imperialism, flattering one's self of charity after causing massive suffering through neo-colonialist looting, etc.

I'm sure Western secularism seems right to you.

{  Thus We have made fair-seeming to each people its own doings.  } Quran 6:108

And, when you say to the unbelievers to stop doing evil in the world, they say, we only do good.

------------

{ Open-minded mature Muslims have evolved beyond that. }

So you get to decide what is mature, and you're complaining about Muslim arrogance. hmmmm.

-----------

{ They don't think in categories like true and false religions. }

Islam itself contains the idea of true and false religions. There is no separation.

Moral relativity is just satanic deception.

God has revealed that only Islam is right:

Quran  6:153

{ This path of mine is straight. Follow it and do not follow other paths. }

----------

{ They appreciate diversity without hurting each others feelings.}

Well, it looks like God has hurt your feelings in His revelations.

You may complain to Him on the Day of Judgment and ask Him to apologize, astaghfurillah.

-------

"I can recommend . . .  Paul Davies."

Davies is already on my list.

----

A true follower of Jesus will do everything to promote world peace and choose his words wisely avoiding to hurt the feelings of other people.

Yeah, right. That’s why he said in Luke 19:27 to slay whoever did not accept him as lord (and no, it was not part of the parable. The parable was over when he said that.)

And that’s why he referred to the Pharisee as serpents and sons of serpents.

-------

Telling a Buddhist that he or she is wrong and a follower of a false religion accomplishes absolutely nothing.

And yet you have no problem telling Muslims that our beliefs about scientific explanations in the Quran are false.

And you have no problem referring to our beliefs as mere myths and fables.

Quran 6:26-27

{

When they come to argue with you the ubelievers say: ‘This is nothing but the fables of the ancients.’ . . . If you could see them when they are set before the Fire!

}

But telling the false religions that they are false does accomplish something.

It accomplishes fulfilling God’s command to warn them that God has revealed that they are wrong.

Quran 51:55

{ Pay no heed to them. Exhort them. Exhorting helps the true believers. }

For example, God has commanded us to tell the Jews also that they are wrong.

Quran 62:7

{ Say to the Jews . . . if you alone are God’s friends . . . God knows the wrong doers. }

God has commanded us to tell the Jews and Christians and idol worshippers that they are wrong. It does not matter that they will or will not believe us. We are to warn them all the same.

----

 “Is there a proof for who is right?

There is proof for those whom God will guide. There is no proof for those who have chosen to not see the proofs.

Quran 52:44-45

{

Even if they saw a part of heaven falling, they would say, it is just a bunch of clouds.

So leave them alone until they meet their Day when they will faint with horror.

}

 

 

IP IP Logged
Matt Browne
Male Christian
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2010
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 755
Quote Matt Browne Replybullet Posted: 19 June 2012 at 3:00am
I have not said that the beliefs in Islam are myths. I have said that the Quran contains myths among other forms of content. Myths convey spiritual truths. They have deeper meanings. Myths are about the human struggle to deal with the great passages of time and life—birth, death, marriage, the transitions from childhood to adulthood to old age. They meet a need in the psychological or spiritual nature of humans. Myths rely on archetypes such as heroes, martyrs, and wise men.

None of the Quran quotes above have anything to do with science and scientific discoveries. Making this connection is a form of delusion. The Quran is a wonderful book. A book we should all appreciate. But it is not a book of science.

Let's look at the issue from a different angle. Let's take 5000 of the smartest Muslims on Earth who lived between the years 1350 and 1950 and who knew the Quran extremely well, even having memorized most or all of it.

How do you explain the fact that not a single of these 5000 people have made a single significant contribution to science in that period of time? If the Quran contains more than 1000 relevant statements about science as you claim, we should have numerous examples of educated Muslims contributing to science.

So can you explain this?

And have a look at this list of scientists:

http://www.adherents.com/people/100_scientists.html

You seem to continue to call me a disbeliever, which I find offensive and many other Christians find it offensive as well. Using words like infidel, unbeliever and false religions is a way of threatening world peace. It's one of the reason why so many people in the West are afraid of Muslims. It's the reason why this form of Islam leads to violence. Islam will stop being a threat for the world when Muslims stop claiming that the spiritual truths of their religion is the only truth and that it should be accepted by everybody. As long as Muslims talk about a future victory over all other religions there will be no peace.

The path to peace is the appreciation of diversity and the coexistence of multiple spiritual truths.



Edited by Matt Browne - 19 June 2012 at 3:32am
A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt
IP IP Logged
Beebok
Male Islam
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2012
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Quote Beebok Replybullet Posted: 19 June 2012 at 6:44pm

I love this site !

Not only do we Muslims get to point out the miracles of the Quran such as the descriptions of natural phenomenon long before modern science discovered them, but in addition to that we also get to point out another truth in the Quran: the perfect prediction of how the disbelievers will react when confronted with the signs of the truth.

The Quran predicts that they will be blind to it, and behold, even when you put it right in front of their eyes, they absolutely can not see it and say that it is not there.

Praise be to God.

The disbelievers have inadvertently helped us point out another miracle of the Quran: the perfect prediction of their blindness to the obvious.

That’s amazing if you think about it. I would have thought that when you put something in front of somebody’s eyes, they will have to acknowledge it; but just as the Quran predicted, they absolutely can not see it!

This site is also useful because it allows for pointing out the deceptions of the disbelievers.

So this site is useful for:

1. Pointing out the descriptions of nature in the Quran that scientists discovered later.

2. Pointing out the accuracy of the prediction of the Quran of the blindness of the disbelievers.

3. Pointing out the deceptive tactics of the disbelievers. 

If the disbelievers were not here, we Muslims could only have the first and would not have the opportunity for the second and third above.

At first, I thought about reporting Matt Browne to the site administrators for the insulting comments calling Muslims arrogant and narcissistic; but then I thought to myself, “wait a minute, this guy is very useful to help me point out to my Muslim brethren the kinds of deceptions that disbelievers use, just like Schmikbob and the other guy were useful by pointing out their contradictions and insincerity.”

He complains that referring to them as disbelievers is offensive after he gets through talking about Muslim arrogance and Muslim narcissism

Do you think he really cares about hurt feelings?

The Quran refers to them as disbelievers and he is just trying to shut us up from repeating the Quran.

The response to him should be, if you take offense to how God has described you in his revelations, then you may ask Him to apologize and recant. Only then will we stop saying it.

Here is another example. On one hand he says that he is against telling people that their beliefs are wrong; but then he adamantly tells us Muslims that our beliefs about the scientific accuracies in the Quran are wrong.

What can we glean from that? He doesn’t believe what he is himself saying. He is just trying to get us Muslims to be silent because he doesn’t like what we are saying; so he is using every deception he can find to accomplish that.

Here is another example. In one sentence he says that he does not say that beliefs in Islam are myths. In the very next sentence he says that the Quran (the main source of beliefs in Islam) contains myths. Seriously?

He claims that mixing science and scripture is an insult to both. Do you think he really cares about that, or that he is just trying to shut us up?

At least the Florida pastor who burnt the Quran expressed his true feelings. Give me a thousand like him before the one that says let’s be nice from one side of his mouth then mutters insults under his breath from the other side of his mouth like calling me delusional. 

Why do you think Saladin gave king Richard a spare horse after Richard's horse was struck down in battle? Because Richard was honest about his intent. King Richard didn't march into the holy lands with an army saying, I come in peace.

Bush said he wanted to liberate Iraq from Saddam while his corporate masters wanted to loot the oil. Similarily, Matt Brown says he wants to save us from delusion, but his devil masters wants to loot our faith. Lawrence went to Muslim lands saying he wanted to be friends, but was actually sent to further British imperialist policies. Matt Brown says he wants to be friends, but is actually sent to further Satan's imperialism of disbelief. The result of Lawrence was that Palestine was lost and the British RAF dropped mustard gas on Kurdish villages in the 1920's and machine gunned the survivors who fled. The result of a Matt Brown is eternal hell. I'd prefer a thousand Richards over a single Lawrence or Bush.

Now Matt is saying that if the Quran had explanations of scientific phenomenon, then Muslims would have made contributions to the sciences, as if that is a good point.

First of all, the scientific descriptions are already there in the Quran. There is no point in discovering what is already discovered.

Second, just because he doesn’t know about Muslim knowledge, he assumes it is not there. An ancient Muslim Persian poet wrote, “delle har zarre ke beshkafi, aftabesh dar miyan bini.” which means, “when the tiniest thing is broken, its sun becomes visible.” There was a massive bath in Iran which could be warmed by a single candle. The British tore it apart but couldn’t figure out how it worked.

Third, note how he deceptively tries to hide Muslim contributions to science from the Golden Age of Islam (750 to 1250 AD), before the devastating Mongol invasions that built towers of human heads. (The Mongols conquered Persia around 1256). He starts his question from 1350. Do you think that is an accident? No, he understands his tactics of deception. Cunning, smiling, and rubbing his hands.

Fourth, Muslims didn’t have a serious scientific community. The lack of science is a statement on the ineptitude and lack of motivation and lack of interest of us Muslims, not of the Quran. You can lead someone to water, but you can’t make him drink. Even now we can't get our act together worth squat.

Fifth, those in royal power were just interested in their own opulence and court conspiracies. The Ottoman sultans repressed and outlawed the printing press because they feared it would destabilize their power. The ex-Shah of Iran would imprison inventors whose inventions looked like they might decrease the king’s control. Not only was there no funding or incentive for discoveries, it was dangerous. What would a Muslim do with a discovery? Keep it to himself, or hide it in a poem, or something like that of course.

The reasons go on and on. But better than list them all, hand the question back to him. If your Bible really teaches turning the other cheek, then why did you give small pox infected blankets to the Ottawa? Why did you tell the Arapaho and Cheyenne that they could have peace at the banks of the Colorado river, but then slaughter them at Sand Creek? Is it because your Bible doesn't really teach turning the other cheek, or because you chose to ignore it?

But his question is not useless. It does point out, once again, the sophistry and lack of sincerity in the specious and disingenous arguments of the disbelievers. A devil doesn't have a horn and a tail. He has a twisted smile and crooked words. The horns and tails are not in the physical appearance, but rather in the behavior and in the warm, wormy, words of seduction to disbelief.




Edited by Beebok - 20 June 2012 at 4:06am
IP IP Logged
Matt Browne
Male Christian
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 April 2010
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 755
Quote Matt Browne Replybullet Posted: 24 June 2012 at 2:56am
I'd like to quote the Pakistani physicist Abdus Salam. This is taken from the speech he gave when receiving the 1979 Nobel Prize for his role in the electroweak unification of the electromagnetic and weak forces:

"The Holy Prophet of Islam emphasized that the quest for knowledge and science is obligatory upon every Muslim man and woman. He enjoined his followers to seek knowledge even if they had to travel to China in its search. Here clearly he had scientific rather than religious knowledge in mind, as well as an emphasis on the internationalism of the scientific quest."

Note that he talkes about seeking scientific knowledge, not presenting scientific knowledge contained in the Quran. And the reason for this is that the Quran is not about conveying scientific knowledge.

You failed to offer an explanation for the lack of Muslim contribution between 1350 and 1950. Muslims stopped seeking scientific discovery during that period of time, despite the fact that the Quran commands them to do so.

Now, about the issue of offending fellow human beings.

Christians who live in free countries have the right to draw pictures of the Prophet. Well-meaning and honorable Christians choose not to exercise this right. They respect other religions and they respect the feelings of followers of other religions. They refrain from offending other people. They want to contribute to world peace. They appreciate diversity. They seek friendship between members of different religions.

Muslims have the right to call Christianity a false religion. Well-meaning and honorable Muslims choose not to exercise this right. They respect other religions and they respect the feelings of followers of other religions. They refrain from offending other people. They want to contribute to world peace. They appreciate diversity. They seek friendship between members of different religions.


In fact, in my experience most Muslims active on this web site belong to this category of friendly Muslims and I'm glad for this.

I told you repeatedly that I find words like disbeliever, infidel or false religion offensive.

Well, modern Christians have to live with the fact that a small number of Muslims don't care much about a respectful dialog and that they care more about how superior Islam and the Quran is and that victory over everybody else on our planet is just a matter of time. That their truth is the only truth. Of course, there are plenty of rude and insensitive and arrogant Christians as well and I strongly object to their conduct. I think most Muslims will agree with me that bad behavior of others is no reason to do the same.



Edited by Matt Browne - 24 June 2012 at 3:19am
A religion that's intolerant of other religions can't be the world's best religion --Abdel Samad
Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people--Eleanor Roosevelt
IP IP Logged
Beebok
Male Islam
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2012
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Quote Beebok Replybullet Posted: 24 June 2012 at 7:22pm
"You failed to offer an explanation for the lack of Muslim contribution between 1350 and 1950."

What an amazing bold faced lie. Everyone can see what a thorough explanation I gave right in front of his eyes, yet he has the nerve to claim that I didn't, even when it is open for everyone to see. It was a five step answer plus a bonus that everyone can see by looking at my previous post.

It is as if he didn't read a word of what I wrote.

No wonder he claims that the Quran doesn't contain explanations of science that are right there in front of his eyes. He even denies the clear five step answer I gave to his trivial and deceptive question.

What else can one think of someone who comes here with insults against us, and then claims that our polite talk is offensive?
He insults me with accusations like arrogant, narcissistic, delusional, immature, and yet pretends to support polite discussion.
The deception is so obvious and brazen that it is just shameful.
I gave examples of Christian insults against Muslims, but he claims that it is not there.
I answered all his arguments, but he pretends that it did not happen.
I showed him multiple examples of scientific miracles in the Quran, but he pretends that they are not there.
He claims that it is wrong to tell people that their beliefs are wrong, but he states that our beliefs are wrong.
He calls our beliefs myths, and they claims not to have done so.

That's amazing that even when he is caught in his lies, he still perpetuates them. Even when specific detailed examples are given, he pretends that no such thing happened.

Thank God for this site so that it shows the way that disbelievers will twist the truth when it is made evident.

It is like the Pharoah. Even when hs sorcerers lost against Moses, the Pharoah who saw it with his own eyes refused to believe it.

Such do the disbelievers oppress their own hearts as they wish to deceive others.
Just as the Pharoah denied the miracles in front of him, so do the disbelievers deny the miracles in the Quran.
Then they try to change the topic of discussion from scientific miracles in the Quran to politeness, even in light of their extreme rudeness.

It should increase the faith of the believers to have the deceptions of the disbelievers so frequently revealed.

Praise be to God to gift us with this site such that the deceptions and contradictions and hypocricy of the disbelievers can be so frequently and easily demonstrated.



Edited by Beebok - 24 June 2012 at 8:26pm
IP IP Logged
Beebok
Male Islam
Groupie
Groupie
Avatar

Joined: 12 May 2012
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 72
Quote Beebok Replybullet Posted: 24 June 2012 at 8:28pm

Well, since Matt Browne is obviously just resorting to repeating the same arguments that have been repeatedly rebuffed, it is time to get back to the other arguments.

If the disbelievers enjoy arguing just for the sake of arguing, then they can argue with Hell for eternity. They can say to the flames, we are not in Hell, and then Hell will say, yes you are, and they can exchange that for eternity.

It is enough for us who are sincere that he has been disproven so many times.

As for the others, Let us move on and look at some more of the deceptions of the other disbelievers. Let us look at Ron Webb again.

He states, "The reason you don't see these as contradictions is that every time science disproves something in the Quran (or the Bible, or any other religious text) the believers simply abandon the literal interpretation and retreat into metaphor or abstraction. "

That's just his accusation against us. He never brings any proof of that. It just shows his speculation and conjecture.

He says, "The whole Quranic depiction of cosmology is equally nonsensical (e.g., references in the Quran to the sky as a "roof" or "canopy", stars falling from the sky,"

As for stars falling, stars do fall into the gravity of black holes.

As for the sky being a canapy, it is indeed. It surrounds the earth and it keeps out the suns harmful ultraviolet rays.

Praise be to God, SuponAllah !

The exact things that the disbelieves bring to try to show that the Quran is wrong are just more examples of the Quran being right.

Actually, the Quran does not say that the stars fall to the earth, it just says that they fall; and indeed they do fall into black holes.

Quran chapter 52, verse 44:

And if they were to see a fragment of the heaven falling, they would say: A heap of clouds.

and in another translation of the same verse.

If they saw a part of heaven falling down, they would still say it is but a mass of clouds.

As I read the above verse, there are certain segments that jump out at me like this:

1. falling down

2. a part of heaven

3. saw

4. of clouds

5.  they would still say

6. but

7. a mass

8. they saw

The most important and noticeable part of that sentence is the term "falling down" because it does not say "towards earth" or "to the ground" or anything like that. It does not say, "falling down towards earth." It just says, "falling down" or just "falling" in the first translation. The abscence of something like "to the ground" or "to the earth" is very conspicous to me.

I ask myself, well, where else besides earth can something fall? I answer myself, an object can fall any where there is sufficient gravity. The earth is not the only object in the universe that has gravity. Gravity occurs on anything that has enough mass.

The greater the mass, the more it warps space around itself, and so the greater the gravitational pull will be.

So, the abscence of words like "to the earth" is significant to me. Interpretation of a text to me occurs not just with the words that are present, but also with the words that are abscent.

The second part that I notice is "a part of heaven."

I ask myself, what is an example of "a part of heaven?"

I imagine stars, planets, meteors, and the light given off by the stars.

I'll come back to this a little later.

So then I look at the word "saw."

Here the Quran is emphasizing the visual aspect of the fall of a part of heaven. The Quran is talking about what this fall of a part of heaven would look like.

I ask myself, what would it look like for "a part of heaven" to fall.

That would require planets, stars, and the light of the stars to fall. Can I imagine what that fall would look like? Would it be a straight line like a ball dropped from my hand?

Considering that something with enough gravitational power to pull stars and the light of stars towards itself would curve space to an intense degree, I think that the fall would appear more like water circling around a drain.

Maybe it would look like hurricane clouds circling the eye of the hurricane.

Is there anywhere that I have seen something like that before?

Well, I have seen science documentaries that illustrate black holes in space which have such intense gravitational pulls that stars and even the light of stars fall down towards them. These images to me look very much like the clouds of a hurricane orbiting the eye of the hurricane.

That leads nicely to the next part of the sentence which jumped out at me. The word "clouds."

I find it interesting that the word used here is the plural "clouds" and not the single "cloud." The Quran does not say that it will resemble a cloud, but rather that it will resemble clouds.

Also, I find it interesting that the Quran does not say that the falling section of heaven will resemble seperate clouds, but rather a plurality of clouds as one mass or heap or group, depending on the translation.

If the Quran had said that the falling heaven would resemble a single cloud, then this verse would be less interesting to me.

Likewise, if the Quran had said that the clouds were in seperate masses, then this verse would also have been less interesting to me.

Rather, the Quran describes a plurality of clouds in a single mass. A hurricane is just that. It is a cluster of clouds as a single rotating mass.

Note the following quotes:

"All hurricanes form from preexisting cloud clusters." - http://www.met.tamu.edu/class/wflm/tut/hurricane/hurr4.html

and

The eyewall surrounding the eye is composed of dense clouds that contain the highest winds in the storm.

The storm's outer rainbands (often with hurricane or tropical storm-force winds) are made up of dense bands of

thunderstorms ranging from a few miles to tens of miles wide and 50 to 300 miles long.

http://hurricanes.noaa.gov/pdf/hurricanebook.pdf

This is what a black hole resembles when viewed in science illustrations and documentaries.

In a science documentary called "Deep Space Marvels," released in the year 2001, in an episode entitled "Survival," it discusses black holes.

It stated that while black holes cannot themselves be seen because the center is so small and pulls in even light, one could find the space debris that fall into it.

A scientist on the show said that the planets and stars falling into the black hole would resemble gas, smoke, and clouds like the debris around the vortex of a tornado.

The scientist actually used the exact word "clouds" as part of the description to describe the planets and stars falling into the black hole.

Here again is surah 52, ayat 54:

If they saw a part of heaven falling down, they would still say it is but a mass of clouds.

So, not only do stars fall as the Quran states, the disbelievers do describe it as clouds, just as the Quran predicts.

Ron Webb assumed that the phrase stars falling referred to falling to the earth. He added those words to the text in his mind to match his expectation that the Quran was wrong.

So, the error is not in what is in the Quran, but in the expectation in his mind.

Praise be to Allah !

Not only does the Quran give accurate explanations of scientific phenomenon that were discovered long after the Quran was revealed, but the Quran even accurately predicts the behavior of the unbelievers and the disbelievers.



Edited by Beebok - 29 June 2012 at 7:19pm
IP IP Logged
Ron Webb
Male Humanism
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 30 January 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1403
Quote Ron Webb Replybullet Posted: 26 June 2012 at 8:08pm
Originally posted by Beebok

"You failed to offer an explanation for the lack of Muslim contribution between 1350 and 1950."

What an amazing bold faced lie. Everyone can see what a thorough explanation I gave right in front of his eyes, yet he has the nerve to claim that I didn't, even when it is open for everyone to see. It was a five step answer plus a bonus that everyone can see by looking at my previous post.
 
But really, Beebok, the first three "steps" hardly even address the question (seriously, if knowledge of black holes was already in the Quran, why did no one realize it until black holes were independently discovered?); and the fourth and fifth points merely affirm with Matt is saying.
 
There was a discussion here a couple of years ago (I wish I could find the topic) started by a Muslim, where even Muslims agreed that science and technology had stagnated in the Muslim world for centuries.  You can explain it any way you want, but it's obvious if you just look around the world that most countries with Muslim populations are among the poorest and least advanced.
Addeenul ‘Aql – Religion is intellect.
IP IP Logged
Ron Webb
Male Humanism
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 30 January 2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1403
Quote Ron Webb Replybullet Posted: 26 June 2012 at 8:23pm
Originally posted by Beebok

Ron Webb assumed that the phrase stars falling referred to falling to the earth.
 
And so did everyone else for a thousand years.  So does virtually everyone, including Muslims, today.  Honestly, Beebok, I congratulate your ingenuity and admire your valiant attempt at ijtihad, but what makes you think that you are right and everybody else has been wrong all this time?
 
And besides, what sense would 52:44 make if we assume that Allah was referring to stars falling into black holes?  It would be a total non sequitur.  And if "a mass of clouds" is an apt description, then how does it show ignorance to describe it that way?
Addeenul ‘Aql – Religion is intellect.
IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 36 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. This forum is offered to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization.
If there is any issue with any of the postings please email to icforum at islamicity.com or if you are a forum's member you can use the report button.

Note: The 99 names of Allah avatars are courtesy of www.arthafez.com

Advertisement:



Sponsored by:
Islamicity Membership Program:
IslamiCity Donation Program  http://www.islamicity.com/Donate
IslamiCity Arabic eLearning http://www.islamiCity.com/ArabAcademy
Complete Domain & Hosting Solutions www.icDomain.com
Home for Muslim Tunes www.icTunes.com
Islamic Video Collections www.islamiTV.com
IslamiCity Marriage Site www.icMarriage.com