Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin  Old ForumOld Forum
Advertisement:
         
Interfaith Dialogue
 IslamiCity Forum - Islamic Discussion Forum : Religion - Islam : Interfaith Dialogue  
Message Icon Topic: Muhammad as a partner with Allah Post Reply Post New Topic
<< Prev Page  of 17 Next >>
Author Message
Meditations
 
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2002
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Quote Meditations Replybullet Posted: 08 October 2009 at 11:27am
Originally posted by Ron Webb

I assume then that you would disagree with honeto's statement (Oct. 5, 7:18 p.m.): "... the prophet is His chosen person to lead mankind toward the right, till the end of time."  But you do believe that the Prophet's words in the Hadith remain authoritative for all time, don't you?

Yes, this is the Islamic view of Prophet's words, that it is authoritative for all time, not only during his times

Originally posted by Ron Webb

Well, just to be clear, I didn't say he was ordered not to explain.  I said that he was not ordered to explain. 

Will you please tell us how did you come with this conclusion ?
The Prophet ( PBUH ) was ordered to deliver the message AND explain it

بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ وَالزُّبُرِ وَأَنزَلْنَا إِلَيْكَ الذِّكْرَ لِتُبَيِّنَ لِلنَّاسِ مَا نُزِّلَ إِلَيْهِمْ وَلَعَلَّهُمْ يَتَفَكَّرُونَ {44}

[16:44] With clear arguments and scriptures; and We have revealed to you the Reminder that you may make clear to men what has been revealed to them, and that haply they may reflect.
[Yusufali 16:44] ...... We have sent down to you the Reminder so that you may make clear to all people that has come down to them, so that they may reflect and be guided 

وَمَا أَنزَلْنَا عَلَيْكَ الْكِتَابَ إِلاَّ لِتُبَيِّنَ لَهُمُ الَّذِي اخْتَلَفُواْ فِيهِ وَهُدًى وَرَحْمَةً لِّقَوْمٍ يُؤْمِنُونَ {64}

[16:64]And so it is, We have sent down the Book to you, specifically to make clear to them about which they dispute. Thus it is indeed a guidance and mercy for a people who believe ( in divine revelation ) 



Originally posted by Ron Webb

The Quran itself contains all the explanations that are necessary; otherwise it would not be complete and perfect.

Necessary for what ? Faith, practices, financial dealings, or what ?

Qur'an demonstrates the principles of some and the details of others, and instructs us to follow the Prophet (PBUH) in application of all for He ( PBUH ) is the role model for how to apply the principles and orders in the Qur'an

For instance, Qur'an demonstrates the principles and details of faith, but doesn't demonstrate the details of practices like prayers , fasting, zakah ( charity )

In Islamic fiqh ( jurisdiction ) there's about 1.2 million points of discussion ( yes 1 million 200 thousand ), the sources for these points doesn't come only from the Qur'an, it' is the First source, but not the only one

This is why when sayeda Aisha was asked about the manners of the Prophet (PBUH) , her answer was , don't you read the Qur'an ? His manners was the Qur'an

Originally posted by Ron Webb

In fact, I believe it states in at least one place that Allah made it easy to understand.  Moreover, he was certainly ordered not to add anything to the Quran.

True, which was never done
but Qur'an also ordered us to follow the Prophet (PBUH)

Originally posted by Ron Webb

And so have innumerable imams and other leaders, but their explanations are not authoritative, i.e. they can be questioned, disputed or re-interpreted; nor are they universal.  In other words, they are not holy scripture.

Correct,

Imam Malik has a famous saying that illustrates muslims believe in that, when he stood near the grave of Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) and said

We can take and reject from everyone, except for that who's in this grave

Originally posted by Ron Webb

More importantly, the hadiths go well beyond mere explanation. They add all sorts of rules, penalties, interpretations and other details not found in the Quran.

True as well, because they come from the Prophet ( PBUH ) whose sayings are guided from God whom instructed us to follow the Prophet ( PBUH )

Originally posted by Ron Webb

What I'm saying is that any such instructions are not authoritative.  They do not come directly from Allah, and do not necessarily apply for all time.

The Qur'an doesn't come directly from God as well, it comes through Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH )

The Qur'an instructed us to follow him, and this is why his words became authoriative

There're numerous verses that instructs believers to obey the Prophet ( PBUH ) , these verses are authoritative and for all times and so the instructions in it are for all times

مَّنْ يُطِعِ الرَّسُولَ فَقَدْ أَطَاعَ اللّهَ وَمَن تَوَلَّى فَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ عَلَيْهِمْ حَفِيظًا {80}
[ 4:80] Whoever obeys the Messenger, he indeed obeys Allah, and whoever turns back, so We have not sent you as a keeper over them.

فَلاَ وَرَبِّكَ لاَ يُؤْمِنُونَ حَتَّىَ يُحَكِّمُوكَ فِيمَا شَجَرَ بَيْنَهُمْ ثُمَّ لاَ يَجِدُواْ فِي أَنفُسِهِمْ حَرَجًا مِّمَّا قَضَيْتَ وَيُسَلِّمُواْ تَسْلِيمًا {65}

[4:65] But no, by the Lord, they can have no (real) Faith, until they make thee judge in all disputes between them, and find in their souls no resistance against Thy decisions, but accept them with the fullest conviction.

وَمَن يُطِعِ اللّهَ وَالرَّسُولَ فَأُوْلَـئِكَ مَعَ الَّذِينَ أَنْعَمَ اللّهُ عَلَيْهِم مِّنَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَالصِّدِّيقِينَ وَالشُّهَدَاء وَالصَّالِحِينَ وَحَسُنَ أُولَـئِكَ رَفِيقًا {69}
[Shakir 4:69] And whoever obeys God and the Messenger, these are with those upon whom Allah has bestowed favors from among the prophets and the truthful and the martyrs and the good, and a goodly company are they!

قُلْ إِن كُنتُمْ تُحِبُّونَ اللّهَ فَاتَّبِعُونِي يُحْبِبْكُمُ اللّهُ وَيَغْفِرْ لَكُمْ ذُنُوبَكُمْ وَاللّهُ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ {3:31}
[3:31]Say
(O Muhammad, to mankind): If you love God, then follow me, God will love you and forgive you your faults, and God is Forgiving, Merciful

قُلْ أَطِيعُواْ اللّهَ وَالرَّسُولَ فإِن تَوَلَّوْاْ فَإِنَّ اللّهَ لاَ يُحِبُّ الْكَافِرِينَ {32}
 [3:32 Say: Obey God and the Messenger; but if they turn back, then surely God does not love the unbelievers.

قُلْ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنِّي رَسُولُ اللّهِ إِلَيْكُمْ جَمِيعًا الَّذِي لَهُ مُلْكُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالأَرْضِ لا إِلَـهَ إِلاَّ هُوَ يُحْيِـي وَيُمِيتُ فَآمِنُواْ بِاللّهِ وَرَسُولِهِ النَّبِيِّ الأُمِّيِّ الَّذِي يُؤْمِنُ بِاللّهِ وَكَلِمَاتِهِ وَاتَّبِعُوهُ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَهْتَدُونَ {158}
[7:158] .... and follow him ( the Prophet )so that you may be guided."

وَأَطِيعُواْ اللّهَ وَالرَّسُولَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُرْحَمُونَ {132}
[3:132] And obey God and the Messenger; that ye may obtain mercy.

Originally posted by Ron Webb

There may have been particular reasons (cultural, historical, practical) why Muhammad recommended them.  We don't know. What we do know is that if they are not included in the Quran, then they are not an essential part of Islam.

Whom do you refer to by 'we' ? for muslims don't think so for sure

If we follow what you're implying to, then here's something that we don't know, which you would consider unimportant, and not an essential part of Islam

We wouldn't know the details of each prayers, that Morning prayer ( subh ) is 2 rak'a while Noon prayer( zuhr ) is 4 ...etc.
We wouldn't know how to perform prayer, do we read Qur'an first then bow down , or the other way around, do we read Qur'an , or zikr or .. ?
Wouldn't know when we should break our fasting, is it immediately after sunset while there's light visible, or when it's totally dark
We wouldn't know how much money one should own before paying zakah, for how long, and how much is the zakah we should pay
We wouldn't know which month we perform hajj, how to perform it

The list goes on

Basicly Islam would me more of a spiritual practices, that's based on each individual preferences, not a religion that unites believers

This is probably what many people want Islam to be, but this is not the Islamic belief

The idea you're talking about is not new, it's almost 1300 years old, and has been refuted since then
Some people who call themselves the Qur'anist share some of the things you proposed, and their ideas have been refuted as well

It's worth noting that the Prophet ( PBUH ) warned us explicitly from doing just tha, He ( PBUH ) said :

It's close that a man leaning on his couch and when he's spoken to by my words he would say:

"what's between us and you is the book of God ( only ), what we find in it that's permissible ( halal ) we consider permissible and what we find in it forbidden ( haram ) we consider forbidden!"

For what the messenger of God made forbidden is the same as what God made forbidden

Narrated by Ibn Majja ( 12 ) and Al Darami ( 585 )

So, what you're proposing has been refuted, and we have been warned to not do since over 1400 years ago

Hope this explains all

Feel free to ask any more questions

Best Regards

IP IP Logged
Ron Webb
Male Humanism
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 30 January 2008
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 984
Quote Ron Webb Replybullet Posted: 08 October 2009 at 5:49pm

Originally posted by Shasta'sAunt

I would agree with Honeto's statement in that the Prophet Mohammed was the LAST Prophet or Messenger that God sent. Therefore the message he conveyed and the Laws of God contained therein are valid until the end of time.

The message being the Quran, I assume.  But honeto says that Muhammad continues to "lead" Muslims, even long after his death, and I don't think he is alone in that belief.  Doesn't eternal leadership sound a lot like partnership with God?

Allah made the Quran easy to understand, but if something is an entirely new and foreign concept it still takes explanation. If you took someone out of the jungles of Borneo who had never experienced "civilization" and tried to show them the proper way to use silverware it would take some explanation. Sure, using a fork is not that difficult, unless you've never seen one before or even considered the concept of eating utensils.

If the Quran had been a book of table manners, surely Allah would have been capable of writing an adequate explanation of the correct usage of eating utensils without a written supplement from Muhammad.  Maybe Muhammad could have provided a "hands-on" demonstration for his contemporaries, but that would have been no help to subsequent generations and would be fundamentally different from a written hadith or sunna.

The Quran tells us how to perform wudu ... when to pray ... and how to pray

Exactly.  (And thanks for those quotes.)  It seems pretty clear to me, and where it is unclear that can only be intentionally so, because the details are unimportant -- not because Allah failed to explain it adequately.

Addeenul ‘Aql – Religion is intellect.
IP IP Logged
Ron Webb
Male Humanism
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 30 January 2008
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 984
Quote Ron Webb Replybullet Posted: 08 October 2009 at 6:10pm


Originally posted by Meditations

And how did you decide that these two attributes should only be attributed to God ?
Note that these attributes are 'given' from God to the Prophets, it's not a self standing attributes
It's also given to other creatures as well if God wishes
The attribute of infallibility for instance is given to the angels whom deliver God's messages / revelations to humans


I know nothing of angels, but I know plenty about humans.  To insult a man is not ordinarily blasphemous; and man by his very nature is imperfect and capable of mistakes. 

The logical reason, is that if God kept the Prophets vulnerable to errors, then the message they are sent with would be lost, or the role model they are representing would be incorrect

It is reasonable to suppose that a man could recite the "message" (the Quran) without errors, and if he did make an error Allah could correct him.  What I said was that there is no logical reason to suppose that Muhammad was correct in everything he said or did; and your quotes from the Quran do not support such a claim.

Well, we need to know what you consider to be most of the attributes of a partner to start with, then we can see if we're attributing it to Prophet Muhhammad ( PBUH ) ?

I've already mentioned the degree of reverence, the protection from insult, infallibility, the function of defining doctrine, and authority that transcends time and space.  However, I think it's more important to know what Muslims would consider to be the attributes of a partner to Allah.  Aside from the error of addressing prayers directly to Allah, what else would constitute the sin of shirk?



Edited by Ron Webb - 08 October 2009 at 6:11pm
Addeenul ‘Aql – Religion is intellect.
IP IP Logged
Ron Webb
Male Humanism
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 30 January 2008
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 984
Quote Ron Webb Replybullet Posted: 08 October 2009 at 7:08pm

Originally posted by Meditations

Will you please tell us how did you come with this conclusion ?
The Prophet ( PBUH ) was ordered to deliver the message AND explain it

The passages you quoted state that the purpose of the Quran (a.k.a. the "Reminder", "the Book") is for Muhammad to make clear what is revealed.  In other words, Muhammad recites the Quran, and thus makes it clear what has been revealed.  It is not an invitation for Muhammad to add his own commentary, which would have made it unclear what had been revealed by Allah and what had not; and indeed Muhammad forbade the scribes to record his own words for exactly that reason.

For instance, Qur'an demonstrates the principles and details of faith, but doesn't demonstrate the details of practices like prayers , fasting, zakah ( charity )

Exactly, because those details are unimportant and may vary with different times and circumstances.

True as well, because they come from the Prophet ( PBUH ) whose sayings are guided from God whom instructed us to follow the Prophet ( PBUH )

There is no evidence in the Quran that his sayings, aside from the Quran itself, were guided by God.  The instruction to "follow the Messenger" (not the Prophet) means to follow him in his capacity as a messenger, in other words to abide by his message. 

At best it could be interpreted as instructions to his contemporaries to follow Muhammad as a leader among men, i.e. as a political or social leader; but it makes no sense to follow a leader who is long dead, unless we are to follow him into death.  For example, in sura 4:65 how are we in 2009 supposed to make Muhammad "judge in all disputes"?  How can a dead man judge anything?

Basicly Islam would me more of a spiritual practices, that's based on each individual preferences, not a religion that unites believers

Islam "unites" believers!?  LOL Sunnis and Shias have been slaughtering each other for centuries over silly unimportant differences in dogma that have no basis in the Quran!

And that, by the way, is my point.  I am not a Muslim myself, so I have no personal stake in its dogma.  However, for the sake of the world as a whole I would very much like Islam to be a "religion of peace", as it claims; and IMHO that cannot happen as long as it is tied to the corrupt and anachronistic hadith.
Addeenul ‘Aql – Religion is intellect.
IP IP Logged
Sign*Reader
 
Senior Member
Senior  Member


Joined: 02 November 2005
Online Status: Online
Posts: 1938
Quote Sign*Reader Replybullet Posted: 08 October 2009 at 10:01pm
Originally posted by Ron Webb

The Quran tells us how to perform wudu ... when to pray ... and how to pray

Exactly.  (And thanks for those quotes.)  It seems pretty clear to me, and where it is unclear that can only be intentionally so, because the details are unimportant -- not because Allah failed to explain it adequately.



 What is clear to you? Which is not even factual...capice, the main reason the Prophet(s) was sent to establish ...worship of one true God (Allah)...Prophet(s) showed it by his personal sunnah and hadith as per Gabrial's instructions which were not part of the Quran...

It is hilarious we have reincarnation of Rashad Khalifa in you here preaching Quran only stuff...It did not work for the Black Muslim reverts  though they tried for quite some time under Elijah M...
Ron, you are barking up the wrong tree...preaching us go the same way as the Christians, where they had a questionable collection of stories and that church took all the liberties in creating the dogma, make it fit any or all circumstances!
And ended up with
What you are saying if the Muslim prayers methods are not found in Quran then they are not important and don't need to be practiced even if they been continually handed down from the Prophet(s) time unbroken... What a proposal you have here asking Muslims to commit a creedal suicide WOW, you have lot of nerve amigo...What the colonist couldn't achieve in a century of control you want to get done with this...
BTW Have you tried this hand on Orthodox Jews asking them to stick to Torah and forget about Midrash and Mishnah and see how far you get!
Tell you what you want to learn or just waste our time in talking nonsense...

Finally the Quran is an executive summary of Allah's plans with references of past and future... the study of sunnah and hadith gives you how were plans executed and the guidelines on how to handle entirely new situations and stay within the legal parameters and not be like the non believers of the hereafter!


Edited by Sign*Reader - 09 October 2009 at 4:22pm
Cycle of Human Destiny: From Faith> Courage>Liberty>Abundance> Selfishness>Complacency>Apathy>Immorality>Bondage>back to Faith or Extinction...
IP IP Logged
Hayfa
Female  Islam
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 June 2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1758
Quote Hayfa Replybullet Posted: 09 October 2009 at 9:10am
My eyes glaze over some more... 
When you do things from your soul, you feel a river moving in you, a joy. Rumi
IP IP Logged
Akhe Abdullah
Male Islam
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 November 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1203
Quote Akhe Abdullah Replybullet Posted: 09 October 2009 at 10:35am
If Im not mistaken and im sorry if this was mentioned but Prophet Muhammad had a right to establish rules, the Prophets were leaders of man.And be it that He is the last Rasool his law is last.what happen Ron you went and found Jesus did you?or are you still Humanist Prophet Muhammad was the best of Humans. [IMG]smileys/smiley2.gif" align="middle" />

Edited by Akhe Abdullah - 10 October 2009 at 11:55am
IP IP Logged
Meditations
 
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2002
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Quote Meditations Replybullet Posted: 09 October 2009 at 5:13pm
Originally posted by Ron Webb

I know nothing of angels, but I know plenty about humans.  To insult a man is not ordinarily blasphemous; and man by his very nature is imperfect and capable of mistakes.

This is the islamic view about humans as well, that they are not immune from errors / mistakes, but we have exception to that, which is Prophets

Also insulting even though is a wrong thing, is not blasphemous, with the exception of Prophets as well 


Your idea is actually challenging the concept of Prophet-hood, if that is the case, then please start a new topic discussing it since this will be off this topic

A simple answer for now would be

To commit a blasphemous act, it implies you're already a believer, you believe in God, you believe in a messenger sent from God
you decide to insult the messenger whom you believe is from God, this implies insulting God
Insulting the God you believe in is unarguably a blasphemous act

if this answers your question, then good, otherwise please start a new topic specifically discussing this  

Originally posted by Ron Webb

It is reasonable to suppose that a man could recite the "message" (the Quran) without errors, and if he did make an error Allah could correct him.
 
Yes, God could, but since we're talking logical without relying on a script then let's use pure logic
First we're not talking about any man reciting, it's the person who's assigned the task of delivering the message

what you're suggesting that he's not infallible
this opens a window of probabilities

Think of this scenario :
The messenger is prone to make an error , which God corrects

A: Either it is corrected while he's about to make the error, so the message he's delivering stays correct to an outsider who wouldn't know that this happened

B: Either it's corrected immediately after he makes the error, so the message stays correct to the outsider while knowing an error happened and was corrected

C: Either it is corrected after sometime of the error happening, thus for an outsider he received a message that was incorrect, which was corrected afterward, with a probability of him/her not receiving the correction

If it is A: then this implies
infallibility.
We know B didn't happen since it wasn't reported to us ( or at least we don't have any proof it did happen )
C: would imply God allowing people receiving an incorrect message from a person who's assigned to deliver a message , which is not logical

 
As I said, this is a simple answer for now, if this doesn't answers your question, then please start a new topic specifically discussing this  

Originally posted by Ron Webb

What I said was that there is no logical reason to suppose that Muhammad was correct in everything he said or did;
 

The same logic used above can be used for actions thats related to Islam

I think ( have to double check ) Actions related to everyday life is a negotiable topic between scholars, whether infallibility applies to just the teachings of the religion or everyday actions as well

Nevertheless, it's unarguable that Prophet Muhammad is the role model in all aspects of life

Originally posted by Ron Webb

and your quotes from the Quran do not support such a claim.
 
I might have said this in a different reply to you, so merging both here so we have only one thread going

The several verses posted, such as

قُلْ أَطِيعُواْ اللّهَ وَالرَّسُولَ فإِن تَوَلَّوْاْ فَإِنَّ اللّهَ لاَ يُحِبُّ الْكَافِرِينَ {32}
 [3:32 Say: Obey God and the Messenger; but if they turn back, then surely God does not love the unbelievers.

Implies obeying the messenger, as a general rule
it doesn't state to obey him only in Qur'an

if you want to put exception to a rule, you have to bring a proof for the exception

Well, we need to know what you consider to be most of the attributes of a partner to start with, then we can see if we're attributing it to Prophet Muhhammad ( PBUH ) ?

Originally posted by Ron Webb

I've already mentioned the degree of reverence, the protection from insult, infallibility, the function of defining doctrine,


As mentioned before, this is not unique to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) only
So it's not an attribute that's for a partner with God
Unless you're implying that we have hundreds and thousands of partners of God ( there's about 120 thousand prophet and messenger ) which as you're probably aware of, not true

Originally posted by Ron Webb

and authority that transcends time and space.

Every messenger had such authority until the time of the messenger that comes after him
Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) was the last of the Prophets, so his message remains authoritative

Originally posted by Ron Webb

However, I think it's more important to know what Muslims would consider to be the attributes of a partner to Allah.  Aside from the error of addressing prayers directly to Allah, what else would constitute the sin of shirk?

As mentioned, some of the attributes that we never attribute to a human or another creature

Self existence
Creation by self power
( not by another's power )
All knowing
All Sustaining
Self subsisting

I have to say that I find the concept of God in western civilization to be quite weak
I recall watching a movie where someone thinks he gained immortality, and he calls on someone and say something like "look as I now have equation with God"

For muslims, even if God gave immortal life has nothing to do with being partner with God, of it is 'given' , not self stated attribute
Same as the power to create, God gave Jesus ( PBUH ), the power to create out of mud shapes that would come to life, believing in this, doesn't mean we believe Jesus ( PBUH ) is partner with God


Originally posted by Ron Webb


The passages you quoted state that the purpose of the Quran (a.k.a. the "Reminder", "the Book") is for Muhammad to make clear what is revealed.  In other words, Muhammad recites the Quran, and thus makes it clear what has been revealed.
It is not an invitation for Muhammad to add his own commentary,

First : If you know arabic , you would know the arabic word in the verse 'letubayen' implies making clear in a form of explaning, some translators simply use the word explain instead of making clear

Second : What in reciting would cause something that's unclear to become clear ? or something that's not understood to become understood
If I don't understand a verse and it's recited to me 10 times, I still won't understand it

Third : that's not how the Prophet ( PBUH ) understood the Qur'an, nor the companions did, and surely the one who received the message is the best one to understand it , correct ?


Originally posted by Ron Webb

which would have made it unclear what had been revealed by Allah and what had not;

First : God revealed many things to Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) not only the Qur'an, an example is the Qudsi Hadith, which are words from God, but not Qur'an
Second : it's not true that commenting on the verses would result on the companions not knowing what is Qur'an and what is not for several reasons :
A: Qur'an is recited, not just spoken,
if you heard Qur'an being recited before, you would know how it differs from saying human words
( if you haven't heard Qur'an you can visit http://mp3quran.net/ where you can hear it from several reciters )
B: It is a muslim tradition to make meetings specifically for reciting Qur'an, if anything would have got mixed it would show
C: In the five daily prayers, Muslims read Qur'an out loud in group prayers, any mix of human words would show up immediately

Originally posted by Ron Webb

and indeed Muhammad forbade the scribes to record his own words

This statement as it is, is not correct

recording comes in different ways, it could be by writing or by memorizing and delivering

As for memorizing, Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) encouraged us to hear his words, understand it and transfer it to another as we heard it, the hadiths in this topic are famous, I can post some if you want
Also note memorizing was the main method of transmitting data for Arabs, who were used to memorize thousands of lines of poetry like you would memorize your home address
If this sound bizarre to you, try to visit some Qur'an schools, where you might find a 7 years old child who memorizes all of the Qur'an by heart, every single word and letter

As for writing
It is true that Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) forbade some companions in the early days of Islam to write his own words, but he later allowed some companions to do so such as Abdulllah ibn Amr in Al'As
Many companions had documents, written in it the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH )

Some of them are :
 
Sa'ad Ibn Ubada Al Ansari
Abdullah ibn Abi Awfa
Samra bin jundub
Aby Rafe'
Abu Harira
Abu Mussa Al Ash'ari ( Kept in Saheed Aly basha library in Istanbul )
Gabir ib Abdullah ( Kept in Saheed Aly basha library in Istanbul )

Originally posted by Ron Webb

for exactly that reason.

I think you mentioned before that you can not know why Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) did something, are you saying now that we can know why he did somethings ?

Originally posted by Ron Webb

Exactly, because those details are unimportant

unimportant to who ?
it was important to the Prophet ( PBUH ), and the companions and to all muslims that came afterward

God orders us to perform prayers, to fast, to perform hajj, to pay zakah

Without these details, either we have an order that we have no exact clue how to obey, or we have individual ideas about how to obey it
either are against the cores of Islam

Originally posted by Ron Webb

and may vary with different times and circumstances.

What's in prayers, fasting, zakah, hajj varies from different times and circumstances ?

In prayers ( salat ) we read Qur'an then bow down, what might happen that cause this to be the other way around ?  

True as well, because they come from the Prophet ( PBUH ) whose sayings are guided from God whom instructed us to follow the Prophet ( PBUH )

Originally posted by Ron Webb

There is no evidence in the Quran that his sayings, aside from the Quran itself, were guided by God.  The instruction to "follow the Messenger" (not the Prophet) means to follow him in his capacity as a messenger, in other words to abide by his message. 
As mentioned before, the rule to follow the messenger is a general rule
If you want to apply exceptions, you need proof for that exception

Originally posted by Ron Webb

At best it could be interpreted as instructions to his contemporaries to follow Muhammad as a leader among men, i.e. as a political or social leader; but it makes no sense to follow a leader who is long dead, unless we are to follow him into death.

We think of Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) as the best leader to follow
Do you know of a better leader to follow ?

Will you please read about His legacy ( PBUH ) , as a husband, leader, in aspects such as generosity, dealing with followers, dealing with enemies, dealing with those who hard him, dealing with those who reject him, communicating ....etc. and find if someone else would be a better leader in such aspects

Originally posted by Ron Webb

For example, in sura 4:65 how are we in 2009 supposed to make Muhammad "judge in all disputes"?  How can a dead man judge anything?

By following His teachings and applying it to matters of dispute in our times, this is how muslims understood this verse since the early days, for surely Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) wasn't present every place there was muslims

Originally posted by Ron Webb

Islam "unites" believers!?  LOL

This might sound a laughable idea to you, but yes it does
Even with all the differences, the common between muslims is far more than the difference

We pray to the same God
We believe in the same Prophet ( PBUH )
We read the same book
We pray in the same times, to the same direction
We fast the same month
We pilgrimage to the same place, in the same time

Ask anyone who's been to Hajj, how it feels to be in this mix of so many nationalities, races and they will tell you it DOES unite people all together

Yes, the differences might seem to be more, but then again, if you and me sit in one place, and we have 95% topics we agree upon, we won't be discussing it, we would discuss the 5 % only 

It's unfortunate that we're now in a time where many muslims lost the feeling of unity or nation, but most of the islamic countries have only recently been freed from so many years of occupation, and manipulation by other powers
It takes a long time to get out of this mix of poverty, sickness and ignorance, especially that in several muslim countries the ruling parties do notseem to be acting for the good of the people,
but it will come back again, we're hopefull of that

Originally posted by Ron Webb

Sunnis and Shias have been slaughtering each other for centuries over silly unimportant differences in dogma that have no basis in the Quran!

As far as I know, differences in thoughts never resulted in such killings / fighting on a large scale, maybe some individual incidents

It's only when politics / power / wealth was involved that fighting came to such sad scale

Originally posted by Ron Webb

And that, by the way, is my point.  I am not a Muslim myself, so I have no personal stake in its dogma.

Your knowledge of Islam doesn't sound like a mere stranger to it, were you used to be muslim, or had close muslim friends ?

Originally posted by Ron Webb

However, for the sake of the world as a whole I would very much like Islam to be a "religion of peace", as it claims; and IMHO that cannot happen as long as it is tied to the corrupt and anachronistic hadith.

Well, it seems you based an opinion on hadith, which is broad general
Muslims don't think of hadith in this broad general way, it's categorized in so many categories, ranging from authoritative to some that are not authoritive at all
If you want to discuss hadith, and why you say it's corrupt, please open a new topic

That said, as demonstrated clearly ( I hope ) muslims consider words of the Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) to be part of the core of Islam

Also, the idea of linking Islam to not be the religion of peace to one thing or another in it results in an endless road
First we'll be asked to reject hadith
Second we'll be asked to reject verses in the Qur'an that doesn't 'suit' the agenda for modern world peace
Third we'll be asked to reject group practices ( what remained from it after rejecting hadiths )
and the list goes on
We know this is what some want muslims to do, and thank God this didn't happen, and we pray it doesn't

I hope you found your answers, feel free to ask more if you wish

Also, I would like to note that with all due respect to all members here, I think the majority didn't not study islamic sciences
if you don't find answers you're looking for here, I suggest going to a forum where more specialized people visit, like
http://forum.aslein.net/index.php
the arabic forum is quite active, I'm not sure how active the english one

May God guide us all to the righteous path

Best Regards
IP IP Logged
Meditations
 
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 November 2002
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Quote Meditations Replybullet Posted: 09 October 2009 at 5:23pm
Originally posted by Sign*Reader

According to the Prophet the Hadith were not to be recorded while Quran was being revealed to keep Quranic authority perspective clearly supreme...That should tell you something ...

AsSalam Alaykoum Sign*Reader ( interesting name, I have to say Smile )

I'm sorry but your statement lacks some information, which I find many muslims who didn't study history of hadith don't know about

Recording comes in different ways, it could be by writing or by memorizing and informing others

As for memorizing,
Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) encouraged us to hear his words, understand it and transfer it to another as we heard it, the hadiths in this topic are famous, I can post some if you want
Also note memorizing was the main method of transmitting data for Arabs, who were used to memorize thousands of lines of poetry like you would memorize your home address
This shouldn't be of any surprise to you, when you can find children who memorize all of the Qur'an by heart, every single word and letter

As for writing
It is true that Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH ) forbade companions in the early days of Islam to write his own words, but he later on allowed some companions to do so such as Abdulllah ibn Amr in Al'As
Many companions had documents, written in it the hadiths of the Prophet Muhammad ( PBUH )

Some of them are :
 
Sa'ad Ibn Ubada Al Ansari
Abdullah ibn Abi Awfa
Samra bin jundub
Aby Rafe'
Abu Harira
Abu Mussa Al Ash'ari ( Kept in Saheed Aly basha library in Istanbul )
Gabir ib Abdullah ( Kept in Saheed Aly basha library in Istanbul )

and God knows best

AsSalam Alaykoum

IP IP Logged
Akhe Abdullah
Male Islam
Senior Member
Senior  Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 November 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1203
Quote Akhe Abdullah Replybullet Posted: 09 October 2009 at 5:55pm
SubhanAllah! Salams Mediations.Nice, for me that right there makes alot of sense as do everything I have learned for the last fifteen years.This takes me back to a reply from one of the Christian members that said the Bible(Engil)was like the Hadith first I thought no,but know I think that it is similar since those closes to Prophet Muhammad(SAW) wrote the Ahadith just like they say the ones closes to Jesus(As)wrote the Engil.And niethier of them Prophet(SAW)or(Jessus)(As) wrote anything.SubhanAllah!Hafiz(memorizing)AlHamduillah!
IP IP Logged
<< Prev Page  of 17 Next >>
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Disclaimer:
The opinions expressed herein contain positions and viewpoints that are not necessarily those of IslamiCity. This forum is offered to stimulate dialogue and discussion in our continuing mission of being an educational organization.
If there is any issue with any of the postings please email to icforum at islamicity.com or if you are a forum's member you can use the report button.

Note: The 99 names of Allah avatars are courtesy of www.arthafez.com

Advertisement:


Sponsored by:
Islamicity Membership Program:
IslamiCity Donation Program  http://www.islamicity.com/Donate
IslamiCity Arabic eLearning http://www.islamiCity.com/ArabAcademy
Complete Domain & Hosting Solutions www.icDomain.com
Home for Muslim Tunes www.icTunes.com
Islamic Video Collections www.islamiTV.com
IslamiCity Marriage Site www.icMarriage.com