Originally posted by haris30432

Peace Ron,

Well...if u look at the Quran,an overwhelming part or i shud probably say almost the whole of the Quran perfectly fits with the math miracle.However,there were two verses and an initial(nun)  which stood out like soar thumps and messed up the math miracle in the Quran.Since these were the only few places where the code did not make up,their authenticity was suspected.After further study and refering  to other historical evidences,Dr Khalifa came to the conclusion that these two verses werent a part of the Quran and that they were falsely injected into the Quran and  also that the initial Nun was actually Nun waw Nun as in the original text of the Quran.The oldest copy of the Quran available in Tashkent,confirms the Initial. One non mathematical reason for their (false verses)suspicion wud be that the Sura(chapter)9 is a Medinan(revealed in Madina)Surah but the last two verses are Meccan!How can a Medinan Surah hav meccan verses.From historical islamic sources including the hadiths we know that every single verse in the Quran was verified by a multiplicity of witnesses except verses 128 and 129 of Sura 9.These verses were found with only  Khuzeimah ibn thaabet al ansaary.How can these meccan verses be found with Khuzeimah a late medinan Muslim?.Despite these and many other discrepancies none dared to question their authenticity.The discovery of the math miracle in 1974 proves the authenticity of every element of the Quran.Also over 70 other reasons for their exclusion were also submitted.These are available for verification online. Unfortunately,for some this appears to be a manipulation or tampering of the Quran,to fit the code but thats absolutely not the case.If a proper and unbiased  study of the code  is done,this can be clear understood.