The so cal original bible the have today is in Greek, they don’t have the original in Aramaic or Hebrew which is the language it suppose to be in since that was the language the disciples uses. Let’s used some logic here, again, your name is JUOBERER (English); if you go to an Arabic speaking country or any foreign country that speak another language than yours, what name you think they will call you? By translating your name in to Arabic or any foreign name or they will call you by your same name, the original pronunciation “JOUBERER”? It would be your own name, JOUBERER! They might spell it a little different but the “pronunciation” would be the same. Example: JOBERER, JUBERER, JUBBERER, JUOBERRER and so on.

Here is the catch: the so call original Greek bible mentioned the Messiah by name as “Iesous”; is “Iesous” a Greek word? The answer is now! Does the word “Iesous” mean “Jehovah is salvation”? The answer is no again because it is not a Greek word so it has no meaning! Is “Iesous” a Hebrew word? Yes, it’s in the bible (O.T.) you will find “Esau”; both sounds the same “Iesous and Esau” like wise in Arabic “Isa” all pronounce the same.

Now Jouberer, I would like you to show me how they come up with the name “Yeshua” since the so cal original is in Greek. Does the Greek word “Iesous” mean Jehovah is salvation that is why translates it as Yeshua? Show me, I want hard proof!

You see Jouberer, the Greek word “Iesous” sound more like “Arabic: Isa” or “Hebrew: Esau which spell as Yesua” and the bible scholars see it fit instead of translate it as “Yesua” they add an “h” to it and you get “Yeshua” and that is because of their doctrine, the believe the Messiah bring salvation and “salvation” would be a more appropriate translation conveniently, where as the bible book of Revelation ch.12 tell us salvation comes after the demise of the messiah (S). That would leave you with no meaning for the name “Jesus”.

The chart below will show you even the word “Jesus” didn’t translate from “Iesous” it is more likely they translates it from the word “Yesus” because they always translate the letter “Y” in to “J”

Yael   to       Joel

Yehuda       to       Juda

Yeheshua   to       Joshua

Yusuf to       Joseph

Yunus         to       Jonah

Yesus          to       Jesus

Yehowa       to       Jehovah

tnc

Are your Mike or TNC or can I call you by any name.

With  this names you can came to a conclusion that Jewis can be compared the European names.

Yael   to       Joel

Yehuda       to       Juda

Yeheshua   to       Joshua

Yusuf to       Joseph

Yunus         to       Jonah

Yesus          to       Jesus

Yehowa       to       Jehovah

A word or a name in Hebrew which begins with a YODE (Hebrew Y) would have to be transliterated into Greek using an IOTA (Greek I) and would likely be followed by an ETA (Greek E) or an OMIKRON (Greek O), depending on the phonics of the original word. Since there is no letter in Greek equivalent to the Hebrew YODE the Greek IOTA (followed by another vowel to mimick the required sound) is the next best thing. Transliteration is a mimicking or "best rendering" type of work, not an exacting science. A word or a name in Greek which begins with an IOTA would then be transliterated into English using the letter I. In such cases the I would sound like a Y and if we knew for certain the origins of the first word from which the Greek transliteration was conducted (in this case being a Hebrew word that starts with a YODE) we would be justified in bypassing the I altogether and using the Y instead thats where Iesous is coming from and from the Jewis.

Right Mike or what shal I call you if some is not calling upon my name I would answer him would you.

ISA is "Inshaa Allah (Arabic), OK"
Arabic-speaking Christians refer to Jesus as Yasu

The Arabic name Isa is related to the Biblical name Esau.

What is Jesus' original name? The historically correct answer can only be that it is the name that he was given at his "naming ceremony" (Luke 2:21), the name by which he was called by his mother, his foster-father, his siblings and other relatives, his neighbors, his friends and his disciples during his life on earth. There is no disagreement about the fact that Jesus was not an Arab but a Jew who lived in Israel and was born into a family of pious Jews. He had without question a Hebrew name. His original (i.e. true) name is neither European nor Arabic, so it was neither Jesus nor Yasu' nor Esa. A close phonetic transliteration of Jesus' Hebrew name into modern English would be Yeshua'. In fact, the choice of his name receives considerable attention in the Gospels. His name was not arbitrarily chosen by his parents, but he received his name based on God's direct command (Matthew 1:21, Luke 1:31) because the meaning of this name expresses the purpose for which he was born (Matthew 1:21).

1.    Arab Christians usually use the name Esa for Jesus — though we acknowledges there exists a second name, Yasu', that is used by Arab Christians as well.

2.    There is a considerable qualitative difference between the names Esa and Yasu'. In particular, he claims:

1.    Yasu' is a mere (human) invention. As the source of the invention he indentifies Arab Christians.
By implication, this claim suggests that the name Esa was not invented (by humans) but was divinely revealed.

2.    Esa is Jesus' (correct) Arabic name. Yet, not only that,

3.    Esa is his true name.

The traditional Arabic name for Jesus is Yasu'. Until very recent times, all Arab Christians used no other name for Jesus. And even today, that is the name used by more than 99% of all Arab Christians. Just walk into any Arab Christian church, turn on Arabic Christian broadcasting, read Arabic Christian literature written for Christians. You will only find Yasu', never Esa. Only very recently (perhaps some 25 years ago) some Christians started to use the name Esa in Arabic publications written specifically for Muslims in the hope that they may more easily accept their message if they see the quranic name for Jesus instead of the traditional Christian one.^[1] Nevertheless, among themselves, Arab Christians do not use Esa. Muslims statement suggests that Arab Christians commonly use Esa, and that is simply wrong.

The traditional Arabic rendering or transliteration of the original Hebrew name (Yeshua') is Yasu'. Every choice of transliteration of a foreign name into a different language is a human "invention". The English spelling "Muhammad" is just as much an invention as "Jesus" or "Yasu'" or "Esa". Problems only arise when people like muslims make the claim that the quranic invention "Esa" is the true (i.e. original) name of Jesus. That is merely a polemical attempt to elevate the Islamic invention not only above all other renderings in other languages, but even above the original. That is unacceptable, and it is bad scholarship.

Linguistically it is clear how the rendering of the Hebrew Yeshua'  developed into the English Jesus:

Yeshua' (Hebrew) —> Ιησους (Greek) —> Iesus (Latin) —> Jesus (English).

The crucial transition is from the Hebrew to the Greek. This step was taken already more than 200 years before Jesus was born. The translators of the Septuagint (LXX), the classical Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures, rendered Jesus' Hebrew name as Ιησους in Greek. The Gospels were written in the Greek language and merely followed this long-established practice.

Since Hebrew and Arabic are both Semitic languages, and they are closely related, there are certain well-known rules which sounds/letters in Hebrew correspond to which sounds/letters in Arabic. Specifically, the Hebrew letter Shin regularly turns into the Arabic letter Sin, e.g. the Hebrew word for peace, shalom, corresponds to the Arabic word salam. According to those linguistic rules and relationships between Hebrew and Arabic, Yasu' is the proper Arabic equivalent for the Hebrew Yeshua':