As we have related so far, there is no doubt of the fact that the world
we think we are inhabiting and that we call the "external world" is created
inside our brain. However, here arises the question of primary importance. If all the
physical events that we know of are intrinsically perceptions, what about our brain? Since
our brain is a part of the physical world just like our arm, leg, or any other object, it
also should be a perception just like all other objects.
An example about dreams will illuminate the subject further. Let us
think that we see the dream within our brain in accordance with what has been said so far.
In the dream, we will have an imaginary body, an imaginary arm, an imaginary eye, and an
imaginary brain. If during our dream we were asked "where do you see?", we would
answer "I see in my brain". Yet, actually there is not any brain to talk about,
but an imaginary head and an imaginary brain. The seer of the images is not the imaginary
brain in the dream, but a "being" that is far "superior" to it.
The brain is a heap of cells made up of protein and fat molecules. It is
formed of nerve cells called neurons. There is no power in this piece of meat to observe
the images, to constitute consciousness, or to create the being we call
"myself".
We know that there is no physical distinction between the setting of a dream and the
setting we call real life. So when we are asked in the setting we call real life the above
question of "where do you see", it would be just as meaningless to answer
"in my brain" as in the example above. In both conditions, the entity that sees
and perceives is not the brain, which is after all only a hunk of meat.
When the brain is analysed, it is seen that there is nothing in it but lipid and
protein molecules, which also exist in other living organisms. This means that within the
piece of meat we call our "brain", there is nothing to observe the images, to
constitute consciousness, or to create the being we call "myself".
This is the very point which puts the materialists, who do not hold anything but the
matter as true, in a quandary.
The book in your hand, the room you are in, in brief, all the images in front of you
are seen inside your brain. Is it the atoms that see these images? Blind, deaf,
unconscious atoms? Why did some atoms acquire this quality whereas some did not? Do our
acts of thinking, comprehending, remembering, being delighted, being unhappy, and
everything else consist of the electrochemical reactions between these atoms?
|
|
We know that there is no physical distinction between the setting of a
dream and the setting we call real life. So when we are asked in the setting we call real
life the above question of "where do you see", it would be just as meaningless
to answer "in my brain" as in the example above. In both conditions, the entity
that sees and perceives is not the brain, which is after all only a hunk of meat.
When the brain is analysed, it is seen that there is nothing in it but
lipid and protein molecules, which also exist in other living organisms. This means that
within the piece of meat we call our "brain", there is nothing to observe the
images, to constitute consciousness, or to create the being we call "myself".
This is the very point which puts the materialists, who do not hold
anything but the matter as true, in a quandary.
The book in your hand, the room you are in, in brief, all the images in
front of you are seen inside your brain. Is it the atoms that see these images? Blind,
deaf, unconscious atoms? Why did some atoms acquire this quality whereas some did not? Do
our acts of thinking, comprehending, remembering, being delighted, being unhappy, and
everything else consist of the electrochemical reactions between these atoms?
When we ponder these questions, we see that there is no sense in
looking for will in atoms. It is clear that the being who sees, hears, and feels is a
supra-material being. This being is "alive" and it is neither matter nor an
image of matter. This being associates with the perceptions in front of it by using the
image of our body.
This being is the "soul".
The aggregate of perceptions we call the "material world" is
a dream observed by this soul. Just as the body we possess and the material world we see
in our dreams have no reality, the universe we occupy and the body we possess also have no
material reality.
The real being is the soul. Matter consists merely of perceptions
viewed by the soul. The intelligent beings that write and read these lines are not each a
heap of atoms and molecules-and the chemical reactions between them-but a
"soul".
All the images we view in our lives are formed in our centre of
vision at the back of our brain, which makes up only a few cubic centimetres of the volume
of the brain. Both the book you are now reading and the boundless landscape you see when
you gaze at the horizon fit into this tiny space. Therefore, we see objects not in their
actual size existing outside, but in the size perceived by our brain.
Dreams may be as realistic as real life. A person may even experience
emotions and get excited in his dream in a genuine way not distinguishable from real life.